Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.

Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries Members Galleries Master Your Vision Galleries 5Contest Categories 5Winners Galleries 5ANPAT Galleries 5 The Winners Editor's Choice Portfolios Recent Photos Search Contest Info Help News Newsletter Join us Renew Membership About us Retrieve password Contact us Contests Vouchers Wiki Apps THE NIKONIAN™ For the press Fundraising Search Help!

Lens Reviews

Tokina AT-X M100 Pro D 100mm f/2.8 Macro Lens Review


Keywords: tokina, lenses, non_nikon, macro

Show pages (2 Pages)


For about a month I've been shopping for a macro lens. I need to set the stage for some of my comments and comparisons by saying that initially I was looking at the 150mm Sigma or 180mm Tamron models to get longer working distance. After being unsatisfied with their performance for one reason or another I decided to try a lens from a different manufacturer in the 100mm range. That lens is the new Tokina AT-X M100 AF Pro D 100mm f/2.8 macro lens. I thought I'd share a bit about this lens and why I decided on this lens.


Tokina made flower image

Tokina AT-X M100 AF Pro D 100mm f/2.8 Macro lens



Tokina had not produced a macro lens for several years. This new lens is “digitally enabled” in that it has new lens coatings, particularly on the rear element, to deal with the reflections from digital sensors.


It is a full size lens, fully capable of being used on film as well as in digital. It is an external focus and the front element extends substantially when focusing at 1:1.

In my testing I used a D70 with its APS-C sized sensor so I can’t judge how well it will perform at the edges on a film or full size sensor SLR.

My overall impression of the lens is that it is essentially an updated version of its previous model -long discontinued- now closer to the Micro Nikkor 105mm f/2.8D AF. The design features of the two lenses are very similar.

Click for enlargement

Click for enlargement


Specifications are as follows:


Tokina AT-X M100 AF Pro D
Tokina AT-X M100 AF
105mm f/2.8D AF Micro Nikkor
 Lens construction
 Elements / Groups
9 / 8
11 / 10
9 / 8
 Diagonal angle of view
 On a 35mm frame
 Closest focusing distance  from image plane
11.8 in - 30cm
13.8 in - 35cm
12.2 in - 31cm
 Max Magnification Ratio
 Aperture range
 Number of diaphragm blades
 Filter size
 External diameter
2.9 in - 73mm
2.7 in - 69mm
3 in - 75mm
3.74 in - 95.1mm
3.2 in - 97.5mm
4.1 in - 104.5cm
19.0 oz - 540g
19.2 oz - 550g
19.7 oz - 560g
 Street price when new (USD)


The Pro D comes with a plastic round (not petal) bayonet mount lens hood and a three year warranty.




In comparison to other midrange macro lenses, this one is heavy, and at 19 oz. weighs close to the Micro Nikkor 105mm at 19.7 oz. This compares with 14.3 oz for the Tamron 90mm macro and 16.1 oz for the Sigma 105mm macro. Going to either of the long macros I looked at would take you to about 33 oz, a significant increase in weight. Those longer lenses are a lot harder to handle, but for someone who needs the working distance or narrower field of view they may be worth it. The front element is inset so deeply that there seems little reason to ever use the included lens hood. This tends to diminish the advantage of a longer lens that must have a four inch lens hood on all the time.

The build quality seems very good. The lenses that Tokina designates as Pro, such as the highly regarded AT-X 124 AF PRO DX 12-24mm f/4 zoom, are more solid than the typical consumer models. Although there is plenty of plastic used it does not feel cheap, party due to the weight. It has a crinkle finish on the barrel and the focus grip is nicely grooved solid rubber. Focus is smooth and well dampened. You push or pull the focus ring forward or back to go from auto focus to manual focus, which is more convenient than the Nikkor where you push in a button and turn a separate ring on the lens. It does tend to make the lens bounce a bit when you go from one mode to the other.


This lens shares a number of features with the Micro Nikkor 105mm. Not surprising considering the Tokina heritage. What I consider especially valuable in a macro lens is long throw of its manual focus. Like the Micro Nikkor 105mm, and more so than other macros I've looked at, there is plenty of travel in the macro range. This makes manual focus very easy and accurate. From 1:1 to 1:2 the travel is about 55 degrees. For better or worse, it also shares with the Nikkor the compressed focus travel from 3 feet to infinity. Use as a normal 100mm lens in manual focus mode becomes more of a challenge.


Tokina made flower image

Image made with the Tokina AT-X M100 AF Pro D 100mm f/2.8 Macro lens


The good news is that auto focus works very well on this lens. Even inside in low light auto focus is pretty quick, especially for a macro lens. It is much faster than the longer focal length macros I tested. Although it’s a traditional screw focus lens it is reasonably quite and very accurate even at macro distances. Interestingly, it also focuses in the same direction as the Nikkors (and Pentax) in that infinity is on the far left, compared with Sigma and Tamron that have infinity at the far right (like Canon and Olympus). That is a small but pleasant plus.

Tokina has included a very effective focus limit switch that is easy to use. A large rotary switch is located on the left side of the lens. Twisting it a quarter turn will limit the focus range to either side of about 1:1.2 to 1:2.2, depending on which side of this spot you start on. Using the limit switch really helps when the lens does hunt in auto focus mode, although as I said above, it seems to hunt less that the longer macro lenses.



The effective aperture decreases on all macro lenses as you focus down from infinity to 1:1, usually by about two stops. The Tokina reports effective aperture to the camera as required for proper exposure, and also shows you the effective aperture in the EXIF data and on the camera display. At infinity focus you get the specified apertures of f/2.8 to f/32, but at 1:1 you end up with f/5.6 to f/64. This is what all macro lenses do, but they don’t all report the effective aperture even though as you focus down to 1:1 from infinity you can watch the exposure get longer as you turn the focusing ring. I prefer the effective aperture to be reported, as this lens and the Tamron 180mm do.


This is ultimately where my decision to keep this lens was made. The sharpness and contrast of this lens are both excellent, and significantly better that the Tamron 180mm macro that I tested. Here are some comparison images of a section of a US one dollar bill that compare the Tokina 100mm, the Tamron 180mm, and about the sharpest lens I own, the 50mm f1.8 Nikkor. I haven’t included anything from the Sigma 150mm since I eliminated it from consideration early on due to some unexplained exposure issues.

The original image was taken with a Dollar Bill just filling the width of the frame. It was spray glued to a perfectly flat floor tile. Exposures were made using aperture priority on a Gitzo tripod with a Markins M10 ball head and a remote release. Lighting was my desk lamp and all were taken at the same session with only the tripod moving to keep consistent image size.


All images at right are approximately 200 x 133 pixels, normal sharpening, and auto white balance, shot in raw, cropped and converted to jpeg after opening with the Nikon plug-in for Photoshop CS. No adjustments of any sort were made.

It's pretty clear which one has the most sharpness and contrast, even allowing for the slightly different color casts and exposure responses. What is surprising is how much better the Tokina is than the much more expensive SP AF 180mm f/3.5 Di LD (IF) 1:1 Macro Tamron.

The normal caveat of lens testing applies here; individual lenses may not be representative due to manufacturing variances.

I also took some shots of a fairly large spider in the garden. Shooting hand-held and using a SB-800 flash, reinforced my conclusions about the results shown above.

Finally, I ran some resolution tests using the Imatest program that computes MTF data using a standard target ( www.imatest.com ). MTF is definitely not the whole story when judging lens quality. But, the results again confirm the image comparisons above and my observations.

Image made with the Nikkor 50mm f/1.8D AF

Nikkor 50mm f/1.8D AF @ f/16

Image made with the Tamron 180mm macro

Tamron 180mm Macro @ f/16

Image made with the Tokina 10mm Pro D

Tokina 100mm Pro D @ f/16


Below a chart showing the results at the center of the image of each lens. Images were converted to TIFF format at normal sharpening using Capture, then run through Imatest.


Tamron 180mm Macro
Nikkor 50mm f/1.8D AF
Tokina AT-X M100 Pro D


I'm impressed enough to keep this lens. After comparing it to several others, the Tokina really shines. I could have, of course, just bought the Micro Nikkor 105mm lens and been done with it. I initially didn't because I was looking for some longer working distance. I was also concerned about the bokeh of the Nikkor because it only has seven diaphragm blades and is generally considered a bit lacking in this area.

What I found was that this lens is effectively an updated version of the Tokina M100 previous model, which was already very good and much closer to the Nikkor 105, including a nine blade diaphragm that I expect to produce very good bokeh. And when you choose not to use a lens hood, like you usually must on the longer telephotos, the effective working distance is not that much different than that of the longer lenses. At almost half the weight of the longer lenses it is much easier to handle. I also didn't mind saving about one third of the cost of the Nikkor. I expect to be very satisfied with my choice.
(4 Votes )
Show pages (2 Pages)

Originally written on February 11, 2006

Last updated on April 28, 2016

User User


Rick Italia (italiaimages) on April 7, 2018

I also own this lens and am extremely satisfied with it. Very sharp images!

User on June 24, 2014

I had also purchased a Nikkor 105 VR and decided against keeping it & instead opted for the Tokina 100 macro. My reason was that the Nikkor was just very heavy on my tripod without a tripod mount on the lens. It was also large for carrying around. The Nikkor had all the quality I expected but I just felt that it would be just not be a lens I would use enough to keep. I use a tripod for macro and it was just too front heavy using my camera mount. Got the Tokina and it does focus slower but everything works for me. Great quality in build and sharpness. I already had a Tokina 11-16mm which I love so I was very familiar with Tokina quality and this macro lives up to my expectations and all the online positive reviews. It is the right size send Wright and I love the push/pull auto/manual focus plus the 3 way focus limiting switch. For the best bang for your dollar I would really buy the Tokina 100mm Macro. I also looked at Sigma and Tamron but still felt for serious macro the Tokina was best. Having a arperture ring will come in handy if I use bellows or extension rings. Most current macros forgo this.

Tom Egel (tegel) on July 22, 2013

Donor Ribbon awarded for his generous support to the Fundraising Campaign 2014 Donor Ribbon awarded for his very generous support to the Fundraising Campaign 2015 Winner of the Best of Nikonians 2018 Annual Photo Contest Awarded for winning in The Best of Nikonians 2019 Photo Contest

I sold my Nikon 105VR and replaced it with this Tokina. The Nikon is a beast and I found myself leaving it at home due to the amount of space it took up in my bag. The Tokina travels well and produces excellent images. I don't miss the VR at all for macro work. If you are looking for a solid macro at an affordable price check out this gem!