Levelling images
J. Ramon Palacios (jrp)
Keywords: photography, sins, tips, fixes, composition, jrp, seven_deadly_sins, levelling_images
This is the second part of the series The Seven Deadly Sins in Photography
In my early days as photographer, although I gained much of a good instinct from my father and uncles, there were many things I did not notice or paid not enough attention to. And so I incurred in many sins that prevented me to move from nice photographs to good photographs.
This is another one of such sins.
Martin Turner, professional photographer and Nikonians moderator wrote: “Lines which appear horizontal or vertical in real life work best in an image where they are either as they would be, or substantially at an angle, but not when they are just a couple of degrees off 'true'.” (Wiki/Composition)
One of the several reasons to use a tripod is that you have the opportunity to avoid this cardinal sin in photography by studying the image in your viewfinder before actually pressing the shutter.
Shoreline crooked and lighthouse “falling” to the right
And when using a tripod, you can also have a two-way bubble level in the hotshoe to level your camera, to avoid tilting to a side or back to front. This is most helpful when the horizontal lines are not that clear. Or you can take advantage of the built-in virtual horizon in your camera.
To read the rest of the article, please log in. This article is available to all Silver, Gold and Platinum Nikonians members. If you are not registered yet, please do so. To discover the world of Nikonians and the advantages of being a registered member, take our short discovery tour.
More articles that might interest you
G
29 comments
Timothy Blackshear (NikoBlak) on October 11, 2018
Definitely noticing and working to correct this among many issues!
J. Ramon Palacios (jrp) on May 15, 2018
Thank you, Annie
Annie Parm (annie459) on May 14, 2018
Wonderful informative content. Thank you.
J. Ramon Palacios (jrp) on November 8, 2017
Thank you, Gary. Glad to hear you found it informative. All images presented here as leveled were shot with a bubble level.
Gary Worrall (glxman) on November 8, 2017
Excellent work JRP, Very informative ........Gary
J. Ramon Palacios (jrp) on October 18, 2017
Edward, thank you for your comment. Shooting sports is most challenging. Getting such images leveled is tougher due to the action. Glad to hear it was useful to you.
Edward Beckett (D7KRookie) on October 18, 2017
JRP, THNX for the article. This is one of the first comments I received when I first posted images here. It never dawned on me until pointed out. I shoot a lot of high school basketball, and don't really focus on leveling, more on anticipating and getting the action sequence I am looking for. In PP I always level all shots as the gyms always have some frame of reference. One of my first learning experiences as a Nikonian. There have been and will be many more. This is a great community. Ed
J. Ramon Palacios (jrp) on September 18, 2017
Michaela, we can agree to disagree, but the idea was to use a controversial example ;-) Thank you very much for your comment.
Michaela Perata (mikiSJ) on September 18, 2017
I do not believe your interpretation of the curve of the coast in the cove in your first two images is correct. You are visualizing a curve in a landscape feature from an elevation above the level of the water in the cove. This is different than when examining your horizon image with the horizon centered in the image. If image was of the coast taken at the water's level, then I could see a correction of level being needed. but the correction is not needed in your first image. The view in your first image of the cove is more correct and pleasing than the corrected view in your second image of the cove.
User on August 6, 2017
equilibrioception...absolutely! ;~)
J. Ramon Palacios (jrp) on August 4, 2017
Geoff, Yes, the viewfinder grid helps a lot. However, a bubble level never lies and the results satisfy most -if not all- viewers. As for varying opinions, of course there will always be different perceptions depending on training and equilibrioception sensitivity.
Geoff Baylis (GBaylis) on August 4, 2017
Having the "Viewfinder Grid Display" set on "ON" will help ensure that you have the camera level so long as there are horizontal or vertical lines in your subject to match them against. For those that don't, like "Bandon straight" above, although a tripod with spirit levels will give you an image that gives a true representation of the original scene, it's often easier to see what 'looks right' in post processing with a grid displayed on screen (as in LR's Transform tool): somehow having the grid gives the brain a reference against which to judge the content of the image. However, if there are no obvious horizontal or vertical lines in the image, then what 'looks right' will vary from one critic to the next. Geoff
J. Ramon Palacios (jrp) on August 1, 2017
Thank you, Dan.
Dan Mitchell (danmitch) on August 1, 2017
Thanks for the article JRP - another reminder to me that while sometimes speed is necessary, actually those few moments before pressing the shutter are critical with just small movements left or right, or to correct a tilt, can make a massive difference.
J. Ramon Palacios (jrp) on August 1, 2017
Greg, perception and reality tend to differ. Yes, you loose pixels even when editing in RAW and more in jpeg. Thank you for your comment.
Greg Scholl (Beatkat) on August 1, 2017
Great and succinct points...a reminder to us all....but I can't help feeling a little of this is subjective...like the "fountain" shot. In my eye, it seems that level is actually somewhere in between the two shots posted...the second shot feels tilted a hair left , actually...depending on one's focal point...to Ernesto's point, if you're editing for tilt in RAW...are you losing data??
J. Ramon Palacios (jrp) on July 28, 2017
Bonnie, yes, I took some swimming shots and they looked well when aligning with the end side of the pool, but after cropping the level seemed to be elsewhere. Tricky at some times indeed. Glad you liked it.
J. Ramon Palacios (jrp) on July 28, 2017
Marion, I hope you have upgraded your camera support system.
Bonnie Christensen (BChrisRad) on July 28, 2017
Very timely article, Ramon. I have been trying to work on this with my photo taking. Thought about it a lot this past weekend when taking photos at a swim meet. Most of the pictures were taken on the fly, so thought about leveling mostly when editing the photos. What do I line up--edge of pool, legs of people on deck of pool, lane lines, shoulders of the swimmer, lane line at bottom of pool, etc.? For my eyes, different things needed lining up in different photos. Thank you for the article.
Marion Pavan (pqtrths) on July 27, 2017
JRP: Good points all. As I review my photo catalog, I've noticed (and tossed) the photos exhibiting the problems you're writing about including this one. I'd like to add that I pay attention to cold weather and its effects on the metal adjustments of my tripod head and before that an earlier aluminum tripod: in a Yosemite winter, the tripod, camera, lens after setup would begin leaning to one side as I was ready to capture the photo. Mp
Tom Jacob (sevendayimages) on July 27, 2017
Part II and another great article written, full of usefull information for the beginner or the advanced. Well done Jrp. Now if you excuse me I have to go lie down a bit from seeing the tilted lines in the examples...I have the urge always to shake my head to the opposite side hoping they'll magically turn straight ;)
J. Ramon Palacios (jrp) on July 26, 2017
(Edited by jrp Wednesday, 26 July 2017 ) Yes, Aart. Most frequently an incorrect level is not the product of carelessness, but of untrained perception. If you draw a straight line from tip to tip (side wise) you will see it. Thank you for your comment.
Aart Louw (AartPapaya) on July 26, 2017
Most likely I am not very straight as in some of the pictures, for example, bird and fountain, I could not find the difference between the original and the corrected image. Thank you, for me a very topical problem.
J. Ramon Palacios (jrp) on July 26, 2017
(Edited by jrp Wednesday, 26 July 2017 ) Ernesto, yes! I should have included a remark on resolution lost when fixing in post-processing. Thank you.
J. Ramon Palacios (jrp) on July 26, 2017
Thank you, Mark. Glad to hear you liked it.
J. Ramon Palacios (jrp) on July 26, 2017
Thank you, Marsha. Most kind of you.
Ernesto Santos (esantos) on July 26, 2017
Great pointer Ramon. With today's technology it is easy to correct image tilt in post processing. But what some don't realize is that when you fix in post, you lose or throw away pixelos/image data. When you throw away pixels, you lose resolution, when you lose resolution, you lose detail, acuity, and sharpness. Not good. So try to get it right in the camera.
Mark Roberts (mrob) on July 25, 2017
Like Marsha says great reminder of the details we need to be looking at. Those details really help newbies like me. Thanks
Marsha Edmunds (meadowlark2) on July 25, 2017
Such a good reminder of a small detail if attended to can really make a difference in an image.