Don't miss our webinar with Nikon pro Dave Black 29-JUL-2021, available to all members on Silver membership and higher. More info & registration

X


Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries Members Galleries Master Your Vision Galleries 5Contest Categories 5Winners Galleries 5ANPAT Galleries 5 The Winners Editor's Choice Portfolios Recent Photos Search Contest Info Help News Newsletter Join us Renew Membership About us Retrieve password Contact us Contests Vouchers Wiki Apps THE NIKONIAN™ For the press Fundraising Search Help!
More5

Lens Reviews

Sigma 17-50mm F2.8 EX DC OS HSM Review

User


Keywords: sigma, lenses, non_nikon, 17_50mm

I recently picked up Sigma's 17-50mm F2.8 EX DC OS HSM lens (from herein referred to as Sigma 17-50mm) as I had a need for fast lens covering the standard zoom range. With a few weddings ahead of me I thought this would be a good lens to have in my kit, and it fit my budget, coming in at right around $500 USD.

After much online research comparing the Sigma to Tamron's similar offering, I decided to go with the Sigma as I had used one of their lenses in the past and quite enjoyed it. Nonetheless, before the lens showed up, I'll admit I wondered what quality of glass I would be getting at such a reasonable price.

 

Lightsphere II CLEAR

Sigma Lens 17-50mm



Before I get into the specifics of the lens, I'm going to put this post in a little context. I'm not a lens reviewer. I know basically what to look for when assessing a lens, but I'm not set up for or familiar with all of the specific tests that more knowledgeable lens testers are in this regard. That being said, this review will be more basic than others, essentially, just a guy shooting with a lens and looking for some of the more obvious flaws one might pick up.

Build quality

After taking the lens, its padded case, front and rear covers and hood out of the box, I gave it a once over to make sure visually everything looked intact. All screws were in place, and a quick double check with a jeweler's screwdriver confirmed all showing hardware was tight. No audible sounds were heard when giving the lens a little shake.

The lens' zoom operated smoothly, though much tighter feeling then my other lenses. When extended, the lens measures just over 3.5", with the front element telescoping out from the barrel. I was briefly confused by the zoom ring operation, which is reversed from the Nikkor lenses I'm familiar with. Fully extended, I could feel no play when gently rocking the front element in the barrel. A quick switch of the AF/M switch proved that the manual focus ring also turned smoothly.

Despite being largely plastic on the exterior, at 565g, it's not a light lens, but certainly nothing so heavy that I wouldn't keep it mounted as a walk-around lens. It does have a metal bayonet, which is something I always look for when purchasing a new lens -- learned this lesson when a plastic mount on a kit lens broke, resulting in a bent aperture arm, and a repair bill from Nikon USA!

After the visual inspection, I felt pretty good about my purchase. Of course, the real tests hadn't even begun.

Shooting

First off, the Sigma 17-50mm is specific to APS-C sized sensors, so its angle of view is similar to that of a 25-75mm lens on a 35mm film camera. For my needs, it's plenty wide enough to capture the view of say a wedding ceremony with guests, and long enough to get in a bit tighter on the scene. The 50mm end of it also means it should perform well as a portrait lens, given that it's functioning like a 75mm.

As for autofocus, this lens is both fast and quiet. I didn't record audio, but compared to other lenses I've used, the Sigma is barely audible when focusing and it's quite quick at locking on to a subject. In low-light, it can tend to hunt a bit, but overall it's a very good performer in this regard.

wood1.1

17mm f/2.8 1/125th ISO 200

I figured I'd like to get a sense of how much distortion the lens had and how sharp it was, so I set up shooting a wall made of vertically oriented rough cut lumber. I made a number of shots at the 17mm, 27mm and 50mm focal lengths, and with the aperture set at f2.8, f11, and f22. At f/2.8, the lens shows some barrel distortion and slight vignetting, but nothing so serious at the wide angle that I'd give it bad marks. In fact, once imported into Lightroom 3 and hit with the lens correction settings for the lens, the distortion and vignetting were hardly noticeable.

As for sharpness, I expected slightly soft results with the lens wide open, but was pleasantly surprised. The center of the image was very sharp, and while this definitely fell off along the edges, it was still well within my acceptable limits.

wood1.2

100% crop from center

 

wood1.3

100% crop from upper right corner

 

At the 27mm and 50mm focal length at f/2.8, neither distortion nor vignetting were noticeable to any extent worth mention.

Stopping the lens down to f/11 showed that the lens was definitely a wise purchase. At all three focal lengths, both the centers and the edges remained quite sharp, with distortion occurring again only at the 17mm focal length.

wood1

27mm f/11 1/125 ISO 200

 

wood2

100% crop from center

 

wood3

100% crop from upper right corner

At f/22, the Sigma 17-50mm does seem to lose a bit of resolution, but this is also to be expected to some extent when a lens is stopped all the way down to its smallest aperture. Nonetheless, I was still pleased with the results, though I'm not going to post another image of the wall as it's a little tough to discern this loss of resolution in this subject. You'll just have to take my word for it.

I took a few shots of a church steeple against the sky to test for chromatic aberration, and the Sigma 17-50mm did show a bit of this. The image below is a 100% crop taken from a photograph made at 17mm focal length, f/2.8 1/160th ISO 100. It's not very bad at all, but there's certainly a bit of CA occurring along the lightning rod and the roof lines. Still, nothing I'd give bad marks for, and not anything that couldn't be easily handled in post.

 

church

insert caption

Of course, there are two things I was very excited about testing with this lens: it's bokeh, and its optical stabilizer, which is claimed to allow you to slow the shutter an additional four stops. As for bokeh, I love it. Again, I'm not a professional in terms of lens testing, but to my eye, this lens produces creamy backgrounds when opened up.

 

cooper

1/125 f/2.8 ISO200 50mm

 

Now, I'll admit, I suffer from the shakes when shooting. So much so that when I get down to an 80th of a second, it's questionable whether I'll get even a soft shot. So the OS functionality of this lens was something I was looking forward to, and I wasn't disappointed. I started out a 1/5th, just because I'm an optimist. The results weren't so hot, but had I been able to hand-hold at that speed and get something usable, I'd have probably passed out from shock, dropped my camera and broke the lens anyway, so it's probably a good thing. Shockingly though, at 1/15th of a second, I was actually able to consistently get half-way decent photographs. It's very rare that I would actually try this outside of a test, but it's nice to know I have a bit of wiggle room when working with this lens.

 

cooperfull

1/15th f/7.1 ISO 200 50mm

 

coopoer crop

100% crop

Overall, I'd say this is a winner of a lens. Now, I'll go back to the beginning where I said I wasn't a professional lens reviewer. And I'm still not, but for my purposes, I can safely say I've tested this lens to the best of my ability, and it'll do the job.

 

All of our Sigma articles

We have several resources specific to Sigma and suggest you have a look at the Sigma index.

 

Got a question about Sigma?

You have a question regarding your Sigma lens? No problem - just ask in our Sigma forum.

 

Post a Speedlight Question

 

 

 

(7 Votes )

Originally written on February 4, 2013

Last updated on January 24, 2021

User User

9 comments

David Ziff (davidziff2) on December 24, 2013

Thank you for your very useful review . It's nice to see a reviewer with so much integrity. I have a couple of questions re nomenclature: 1) Why would anyone want to lock the focusing motor? Is that to stop lens creep? Even the kit lens 18 - 55 doesn't have lens creep. 2) You used the phrase: bent Aperture arm. Could you please tell me what an aperture arm is and how it could be bent by the lens? Best of the holidays and a productive New Year. David Ziff david_ziff@mac.com Dec 24, 2013

Jose R. Burset (jburset) on July 25, 2013

Thinking on buying one of these, this review takes me one step closer!!! Thanks Josh for the review.

James Pisarz (James23p) on April 18, 2013

Awarded for his wide variety of skills, a true generalist both in film and digital photography

Great review! Yes it will fit the D60 it is a HSM(AF-s) lens so it will AF and it is also a (DC)DX lens so it will be perfect for your DX DSLR. Jim

Zita Kemeny (zkemeny) on March 5, 2013

Does it fit to Nikon D60 ?

User on February 21, 2013

I've been using this lens for the past year and have loved it. I do notice some vignetting in the corners when zoomed all the way in and at f2.8. Lightroom has no issue removing this with lens correction. Once you start to get around f4 it goes away. I did recently have an issue with the focusing motor not locking quickly. I sent it in for repair and within a week got it returned good as new and fully cleaned. Still extremely happy with this lens on my D7000.

jerry charlton (photo bug) on February 15, 2013

thank you josh. im still trying to decide on a 2.8 lens in that range. after you shoot it some more, please update.

doug stroud (dougstroudphoto) on February 6, 2013

Excellent Josh. I am quite impressed by the OS at 1/15th and at $500 for a 2.8 lens that really has me thinking of purchasing something other than Nikon lenses.

Chuck Vincent (Chuckv) on February 6, 2013

Donor Ribbon awarded for his support to the Fundraising Campaign 2014

Which Nikon Camera's did you mount it on?

Emory Hall (ehall) on February 4, 2013

Hi Josh Great review, thanks for giving me some insight to guide my next lens pick. Emory

G