Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.

You have probably noticed it; we are advertising free and independent. You can support the Nikonians Community through a paid membership and through the fundraising. Big thanks to all of you who are helping out!


Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries Members Galleries Master Your Vision Galleries 5Contest Categories 5Winners Galleries 5ANPAT Galleries 5 The Winners Editor's Choice Portfolios Recent Photos Search Contest Info Help News Newsletter Join us Renew membership About us Retrieve password Contact us Contests Vouchers Wiki Apps THE NIKONIAN™ For the press Fundraising Search Help!

Accessories Reviews How-to's

Nikon WR-R10/T10 Radio Wireless Camera Controller Review

Jerry Harris (J_Harris)

Keywords: how, to, wireless, radio, remote, camera, controller, wr, r10, t10, a10

My Nikon Infrared Wireless Remote Control is a simple remote controller with the receiver built into the camera using the ML-L3 trigger that costs only $17.95 (US street price). Unfortunately, it’s line of sight and narrow infrared beam are overly restrictive, i.e. trying to discreetly point the trigger at the camera IR sensor in group and holiday family pictures or pointing at the tiny front/rear IR sensor when at odd angles to the camera, etc. and a very short line of sight range (approximately 16-feet), is likely to make you miss that precious shot. 


Nikon WR-R10/T10
Click for an enlargement.


To read the rest of the article, please log in. This article is available to all Silver, Gold and Platinum Nikonians members. If you are not registered yet, please do so. To discover the world of Nikonians and the advantages of being a registered member, take our short discovery tour.


Bob Bryer (RockvilleBob) on June 27, 2018

I have the WR-A10/WR-R10/WR-T10 with a D500. The device works great. A big drawback is the flimsy design of the WR-A10/WR-R10 connection to the shutter release connector. You really need to remove the WR-A10/WR-R10 from the camera when you pack it, even for a short haul in a safe environment. I just bought a replacement for one that got jarred and stopped working. For a professed "professional" level design this is a failure. Operationally it is very good.

J Van Den Heuvel (Shuttercup) on June 15, 2016

Thank you for the review and the firmware upgrade information. I have been wondering about these products all day and now I will be able to move forward and complete this purchase for my D4S.

Jerry Harris (J_Harris) on November 25, 2015

Donor Ribbon awarded for his generous support to the Fundraising Campaign 2015 Awarded for his contribution to the Nikonians Articles section

It sure looks like the WR-A10 adapter is the weak link in cameras using a 10-pin remote terminal. For the price paid and Nikon's reputation it should be built stronger and/or redesigned. Hopefully, someday RF will replace IR as the built-in camera transceiver. Hi Jim, Sorry for the delayed response, but no I've never tried a smartphone as the remote. Believe it or not I have never owned a smartphone. I may be one of the last persons on earth to feel this way, but when I leave the house I don't want the phone following me. :-)

Paul F Austin (paustin) on November 25, 2015

I also have a WR-x10 kit. I've tried two different RF remotes with my D800 and only the genuine Nikon operates fault-free. The others had a common fault. When shooting bursts (as in bracketing), eventually the camera and remote would lose their collective minds and either not fire or start firing continuously. The only fix was to turn the remote off, turn off the camera and re-initialize. Since I have a D300S and D800, I use the WR-A10 ten-pin connector adapter. This works fine but is very fragile. The adapter section that the WR-R10 plugs into ripped off the ten-pin plug. I could buy just the adapter but like everything Nikon, it's not cheap. Because of the fragility, I can't keep the remote receiver plugged into the body as I did with the after-market ones. That adds wear and tear on the ten-pin connector.

Jim Singler (singlerosa) on November 14, 2015

Nice review. Have you tried the Wi-Fi with a smartphone as the remote? I normally use Yongnuo 603s (mainly for flash), but my latest bodies (750 and 7200) have Wi-Fi, so there's that. Most of my tripod shooting involves the MC-DC2 corded remote, so I don't do a lot of IR shutter stuff (or Bluetooth).

Richard Luse (DaddySS) on November 7, 2015

Ribbon awarded for his generous support to the Fundraising Campaign 2014 Ribbon awarded for his generous support to the Fundraising Campaign 2015 Ribbon awarded for  his generous support to the Fundraising Campaign 2017

Thanks Jerry, good write up, and we appreciate your taking the time.

Jerry Harris (J_Harris) on November 5, 2015

Donor Ribbon awarded for his generous support to the Fundraising Campaign 2015 Awarded for his contribution to the Nikonians Articles section

While reading the verified purchaser comments at various retailers without question there was a lot of satisfied users of third party radio frequency transmitter/triggers. Jerry

Malcolm Taylor (malcinweston) on November 5, 2015

I use a radio trigger when ever possible especially with long lens setups on a tripod or macro on a monopod but also hand held. This is mostly for wildlife and for me it does make a difference when trying to get the best out of high resolution cameras and quality glass. I have used the Hahnel Combi TF for a number of years(around £60 in the UK)and its not let me down. Range is good (not sure what the range is in absolute terms)and it seems to be very durable. I'm not sure how versatile it is compared to Nikon or other makers products but it certainly does all I need it to do.

MR HUW THOMAS (HUW) on November 5, 2015

Hi Jerry, The unit as tested operates very well as you found out. Your tests and write up were great. The wR is significantly more compact than the pocket wizard plus 111 that I also use. The wizard takes up the hot shoe slot so limits the use of on camera flash items, hence the swap to the WR remote. The WR-R10 and WR-T10 have been excellent. The WR-R10 mount on the side of the body when available(not the d800 series)fouls the RRS L plate. The 800's require the WR-A10 front mount. This arrangement works well on all bodies except for the WR-A10 case failing on continual removal or minor impact or contact with camera straps. Continual removal between set ups is tedious and in itself leads to damage. The Vello unit is more rounded and doesn't foul items as much and is sealed and permanently left on the camera. So I agree WR system is a great unit and a great test review, Nikon just needs to improve the physical design of the WR-A10 for users wishing to front mount the unit.

Richard Creutz (creutz1r) on November 4, 2015

Thanks, very useful article.

Jerry Harris (J_Harris) on November 4, 2015

Donor Ribbon awarded for his generous support to the Fundraising Campaign 2015 Awarded for his contribution to the Nikonians Articles section

Hi Thomas, I'm sorry to hear of your problem with the WR-R10 if using the WR-A10 on a D800 series. I only have the D7200 so I did not get the opportunity to test the WR-A10. Looking at how it is mounted to the camera and its location it doesn't seem to be a very rugged design. Unfortunately, if using a D800 series DSLR one must be extra careful in handling due to the WR-A10. Thank you for sharing your experience and warning us about the issue. Hopefully, Nikon is listening and will improve the ruggedness of the WR-A10. Jerry

MR HUW THOMAS (HUW) on November 4, 2015

I have just come back from Nikon Australia. I have had 3 wr10 -A failures (one on ANPAT15). The unit is designed to rotate out of the way of the bracket and flash button on the camera prism. However the design of the rotating column appears to be inadequate. All three have physically fallen apart ie the case pops open and cannot easily be re-assembled. It effectively becomes unserviceable. I have been requested to resubmit the parts under cover of a letter to be sent to Japan!! My next unit will be glued together in a fixed position. The Vello Freewave micro wireless remote shutter release unit appears to be a sealed unit and not subject to this failure and is half the price. Why buy 3. Well no its not a slow learner exercise.The other two components have not failed and yes the operation of the unit is as you state - good. So how about a more robust construction!

Reno DiTullio (Papachief) on November 4, 2015

Thanks, Jerry, good info.