New webinar coming up: Best of Nikonians annual review, 28-MAR-2024 4PM EST (for all members on Silver level and higher) >>> More info

X


Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries Members Galleries Master Your Vision Galleries 5Contest Categories 5Winners Galleries 5ANPAT Galleries 5 The Winners Editor's Choice Portfolios Recent Photos Search Contest Info Help News Newsletter Join us Renew Membership About us Retrieve password Contact us Contests Vouchers Wiki Apps THE NIKONIAN™ For the press Fundraising Search Help!
More5

Software Reviews

Nikon Capture and Nikon Digital cameras

Darrell Young (DigitalDarrell)


Keywords: software, postprocessing, nikon_capture, nikon, adobe, photoshop, cs2

previous page Page 1/2 show all pages

Nikon Capture and Nikon Digital Cameras

 

One thing that I think really helps my images is converting them in Nikon Capture (NC). I have noticed that the images are visibly better looking immediately, when they are converted in NC. With the new version 4.4, even the speed seems much better, once the image is open.

 

© Digital Darrell

Little Pigeon River - Smoky Mountains National Park

 

Here are a couple of sample images from Great Smoky Mountains National Park as postprocessed in Nikon Capture: Little Pigeon River #1, and Little Pigeon River # 2

I have so much control over the image in Nikon Capture that I doubt I can trust any other programs as much. I get COMPLETE sharpening, color saturation, white balance, chromatic aberration, D-lighting (shadow detail retrieval), and vignette control. To me the white balance controls in NC are better than anything else I've tried, and since they are more accurate (no white balance encryption problems); I find that my images simply look better immediately.

 

 

I honestly believe that the detailed control I have over my images in Nikon Capture make it well worth the USD $100 that it costs. Now that I have new chromatic aberration (CA) controls in Nikon Capture, it is doubtful that I will go elsewhere. I find myself using Photoshop AFTER I have created the initial 16-bit TIFF in NC. I know that the JPEGs out of NC are simply better than from other programs. Photoshop CS, for instance, tends to desaturate the color too much on JPEG compression. In version 7.0 of Photoshop it didn’t do that. Only when I got CS did I find such weak color after a JPEG compression. I bought CS2 recently, and find that it has solved the weak color in JPEGS, so I’m happier with it.

Adobe Photoshop CS2 now has some pretty powerful conversion features in ACR 3.3, and for the first time, I will convert some images in Photoshop. But, I still use Nikon Capture for my best images. Also, for a person who wants the best look they can get, but doesn't have a lot of money, Nikon Capture is only USD $100 while Photoshop CS2 is about 6 to 8 times more expensive. Nikon Capture is very low cost for the level of power one gets!

Nikon Capture is not the easiest program in the world to figure out, at first, but it gives me the most control over my images, and the best results. I had similar results from "Nikon Scan 4.0" that came with my Coolscan 9000, which looks and feels just like NC. I was hooked on the feature set even before I started using NC.

(3 Votes )
previous page Page 1/2 show all pages

Originally written on May 10, 2006

Last updated on October 28, 2016

0 comments

previous page Page 1/2 show all pages

G