Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries Members Galleries Master Your Vision Galleries 5Contest Categories 5Winners Galleries 5ANPAT Galleries 5 The Winners Editor's Choice Portfolios Recent Photos Search Contest Info Help News Newsletter Join us Renew Membership About us Retrieve password Contact us Contests Vouchers Wiki Apps THE NIKONIAN™ For the press Fundraising Search Help!


The Importance of Vision and Your Images

Connie Cassinetto (Via the Lens)

Keywords: connie_cassinetto, composition, previsualization

I think that one of the best indicators for success, using that as a broad term, in artistic or creative digital (or film) photography is the ability to visualize.  What I mean by this is the ability to see a scene or subject and then intuitively know how you want your final image to turn out, using both your photographic skills and your software processing skills.  This may not be a “one-shot” process but instead something that occurs over an amount of time.  

I am not referring to creating an “altered” image, i.e., one with layers where something is added to create a composite, although I have done that and will continue to do that kind of image and that kind of image does include visualization. What I am referring to in this context is an image where the main subject is left intact (and this might be nature or a still life or almost any shot) but, using both sets of skills to work with the subject and/or background, the end result is the final image that was seen in your mind.  This end result, for me however, might include an added layer in the form of a textured and/or colored background at times.  

This kind of image can only be created by a photographer who can visually see the end result within their own mind and can use their combined skills to achieve success.  The photographer most of us know who was an expert at this is Ansel Adams, although there are many other photographers, past and present, who had or have this ability. In Adam’s day, this “magic” was achieved by excellent darkroom technique and skills in burning (making a portion of the image darker), dodging (making a portion of the image lighter), blurring and sharpening, using toners, and by various other darkroom development techniques. 

Today, we do this in the “lightroom,” not referring specifically to the actual Adobe Lightroom software (although this is my main processing software) but to processing technique in general.  

“Maple Leaf.” Nikon Z7, 24-70 S, 1/200 at f/13, ISO 200. This original shot was a dull brown leaf in clear river water with a brown mud and hard shadow background. When I took the shot I knew that all I needed to do was get the shot very sharp and then I could process the brown leaf with a black background. This shot won a 2nd Place Award in a local photography competition in a nature category. The original shot would not have won anything! I made sure to take a darker exposure as I wanted to emphasize the black background.
Click for an enlargement


The type of file we set our cameras to shoot in is part of the total end result and this choice does impact the resultant image.  There is a huge debate that rages on today in various online forums about digital software and digital shooting file format. Is it better to shoot in RAW format (the photographer processes the image) or JPEG format (the camera processes the image), why one or the other?  What software to use and how to use it?  What “should” the software limits be set at…burning and dodging or anything goes? Photography is no stranger to debate and the craft has been debated hotly since the first permanent photograph was taken by Nicéphore Niépce in 1826.   Photographers have often been considered to be “techies,” more than artists, and through time there has been debate on the actual nature of a photograph and of photography, science or art?


To read the rest of the article, please log in. This article is available to all Silver, Gold and Platinum Nikonians members. If you are not registered yet, please do so. To discover the world of Nikonians and the advantages of being a registered member, take our short discovery tour.


Connie Cassinetto (Via the Lens) on March 3, 2021

Ribbon awarded for her valuable contributions to the Articles Section.

Sanjay, thank you. Photography has been, for me, a fun journey to be on. I love to experiment and learn. Good luck to you in your journey.

Connie Cassinetto (Via the Lens) on March 3, 2021

Ribbon awarded for her valuable contributions to the Articles Section.

Yes, Paul, I agree with you that digital processing is similar to darkroom processing. I don't understand why there is such a debate on processing images these days, except that perhaps a lot of people are unaware of the history of photography and that images have always been processed in some fashion. I did a little darkroom work when I took three classes in black and white photography and, from what little I do know about it, processing in the darkroom and processing in the "lightroom" all require skill to get the best you can from an image. I do love the wider experimentation that is available to me with digital processing.

Paul Cassidy (PCassidy) on February 26, 2021

Great article Thanks Post-processing is simply processing the image digitally, quite the same as working in the darkroom to develop the image with light, burning & dodging, and chemistry

Sanjay Gupta (Gupta) on February 26, 2021

Great article and photos. Thanks for sharing your wisdom.