Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.

English German French

Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries Recent Photos Contest Help Search News Workshops Shop Upgrade Membership Recommended
All members Wiki Contests Vouchers Apps Newsletter THE NIKONIAN™ Magazines Podcasts Fundraising

"f" rating of a telescope


Waukesha, US
1136 posts

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author
autoexer Silver Member Nikonian since 27th Jan 2011
Sat 20-Oct-12 03:46 AM | edited Sat 20-Oct-12 03:49 AM by autoexer

i have a 114mm (4.5 inch) with 900 focal length for an f/8 (7.89) - 900/114= 7.89

i hade a shorter tube, i.e. 630mm it would be f/5.52. question - when i think of f-stops in a lens, the smaller the number the greater ability to gather light, a f/1.4 gathers more light than an f/3.5. This does not seem to be the case in telescopes. I can see the difference if i had a 900mm focal length and increased the mirror size to say 6 inch (150mm) then the f-stop would be 900/150=6, f/6.0. The 6 inch will gather more light in the same amount of time as the f/8 scope.

If it works the same, f/6 is faster than f/8, how can the focal length of 630mm gather more light given the same size mirror?

what am i missing here?

i did find this: http://www.chuckhawks.com/telescope_focal_length.htm

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

Df, FA, FG, F