Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.

English German French

Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries Recent Photos Contest Help Search News Workshops Shop Upgrade Membership Recommended
members
All members Wiki Contests Vouchers Apps Newsletter THE NIKONIAN™ Magazines Podcasts Fundraising
newfoundlander61

Kingston, CA
32 posts

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author
newfoundlander61 Registered since 03rd Feb 2013
Sat 15-Jun-13 11:39 AM | edited Sat 15-Jun-13 11:42 AM by newfoundlander61

I read a review this am on the D7100 from a web site called "kenrockwell" and noted this comment towards the end of the review: "24MP in DX is excessive. If you want to get the sharpness I showed at the top in my D7100 Sample Images, you need superb lenses. " I am currently looking purchase a second body to upgrade from a D50. The 2 lenses I have are:

80-400VR old version
Nikkor 50mm AF f/1.8D

Is the observation about needing superb lenses accurate. Keeping in mind that alot of the quality of the image is based on conditions and the ability of the shooter. Would my assumption be if the comment is correct then you would need fixed prime lenses to get good pictures but I am not convinced of this. Comments most welcome. Thanks.

Paul

http://fineartamerica.com/featured/majestic-hunter-paul-otoole.html

Subject
ID
Reply message RE: D7100 Review
1
Reply message RE: D7100 Review
2
Reply message RE: D7100 Review
3
Reply message RE: D7100 Review
4
Reply message RE: D7100 Review
5
Reply message RE: D7100 Review
6
     Reply message RE: D7100 Review
7

G