Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.

English German French

Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries Recent Photos Contest Help Search News Workshops Shop Upgrade Membership Recommended
members
All members Wiki Contests Vouchers Apps Newsletter THE NIKONIAN™ Magazines Podcasts Fundraising

Better than inkjet?

Kropotkin

Bicester, UK
71 posts

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author
Kropotkin Registered since 02nd Dec 2012
Wed 05-Jun-13 01:57 PM

I've been reading the (excellent) book by Mark Cleghorn 'Wedding Photography'.

At one point he says: "..my reprints are relatively expensive; but they are album quality, not a cheaper quality like an inkjet print..."

What does he mean here by "album quality"?

Is there any other way to print digital images than via an inkjet? Even my colour lab just uses a high-quality inkjet as far as I know.

Is he talking about some kind of 4 colour lithographic printing? Surely not? What would a high end album producer do?

Many thanks

--Justin Wyllie

http://www.justinwylliephotography.com/googleplus
http://www.nelsonphotographic.co.uk

Subject
ID
Reply message RE: Better than inkjet?
1
Reply message RE: Better than inkjet?
2
     Reply message RE: Better than inkjet?
3
          Reply message RE: Better than inkjet?
4
Reply message RE: Better than inkjet?
5
Reply message RE: Better than inkjet?
6
Reply message RE: Better than inkjet?
7
     Reply message RE: Better than inkjet?
8
          Reply message RE: Better than inkjet?
9
               Reply message RE: Better than inkjet?
10

G