Corel Aftershot Pro
-
#1. "RE: Corel Aftershot Pro" | In response to Reply # 0
Hi,
Up until about a month ro so ago it was known as Bibble ( http://www.bibblelabs.com/ ). I've used it as my primary converter for about 4 years, and was quite pleased with it. It fit my workflow very well, was easy to use, was actively supported, and I really liked the output. It has, arguably, the fastest output conversion in the raw developer category.
I moved over to Capture One last fall, both for the feature set of Capture One and also due to the lack of communication on the part of the Bibble developers (they had gone silent for a very long time and some had departed).
My view is that Bibble / After Shot is a great product that worked very well for me for a number of years. Hopefully Corel will provide an environment that lets the product continue to thrive.
Mark-
#2. "RE: Corel Aftershot Pro" | In response to Reply # 1
dgs2 Nikonian since 30th Sep 2004Fri 09-Mar-12 08:16 PMI haven't tried it, but Derek Story, on his blog The Digital Story, had a nice discussion of it's features. He was quite impressed. I recall he particular liked the way it implemented layers, which have always baffled me in Photoshop. (Not plugging anything or anyone in particular, just transmitting information.)dgs
Visit my Nikonians gallery-
#3. "RE: Corel Aftershot Pro" | In response to Reply # 2
I had Bibble on my computer for a few years and couldn't get the results I wanted. Then for $20 upgraded to Aftershot Pro to check it out and have been satisfied to the point where I now have my D7000 taking raw only. Duncan.
-
-
-
#4. "RE: Corel Aftershot Pro" | In response to Reply # 1
Hi,
I have used Bibble and AfterShot for a few years, but I now noticed that I don't get the results I expect, especially related to sharpness. It seems I have been using wrong settings, so make sure you experiment and learn how to use it properly. I have been using sharpness on 170 from my D700, but it turned out the files got very smudgy. I compared the result from Lightroom. When I increased to 185 it was much better, but still I find it much easier to get more consistent results from LR, both sharper and more natural skin tones and colors. So I will switch to LR CC now.
Pity though that nothing can be transferred to LR, not even ranking, which is a real shame.
G
Upload images
6
Uploading and including images in forums available to members on Silver membership level or higher. Please upgrade to take full advantage.
Any other Nikonians have tried it?