Has anyone posted a comparison of the merits of each of these head designs? I don't want to dup a previous thread if there is one. Ball sounds great but so does 3-D to me (especially the 3437 with the 3443 or 3444. Price is reasonable as well.) I have no valuable experience with any, having only used an inexpensive pan-tilt. I'm seriously in the market so would like to hear from the voice of experience. TIA.
#1. "RE: Compare ball, 3-D, pan-tilt?" | In response to Reply # 0SzennyBoy Registered since 28th Jan 2002Sat 20-Apr-02 05:30 AM
You might want to have a read on this thread (No Ball) that was started about a month ago. In there is a small discussion by some members on the pros & cons between the ball heads and the pan'n'tilt ones.
It all boils down the what kind of photography you want to shoot... normal general photography or high precision/magnification/detailed photography.
Szen ARPS... A London Nikonian
Visit my Nikonians gallery.