Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.

English German French

Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries Recent Photos Contest Help Search News Workshops Shop Upgrade Membership Recommended
All members Wiki Contests Vouchers Apps Newsletter THE NIKONIAN™ Magazines Podcasts Fundraising

D1/H/x viewfinder w/Dk-17m versus D2H/Hs/x/xs w/out


3564 posts

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author
ZoneV Silver Member Nikonian since 08th Jan 2005
Sun 25-Jan-09 07:20 PM

I've never used a D2-series camera. I understand that my D1H has 0.8x magnification and 96% coverage, while the D2 bodies have 0.86x magnification and 100% coverage at a slightly lower eyepoint (not sure if eyepoint influences perceived size).

I have the DK-17m on my D1H. It has a 1.2x factor. So that gives my camera 0.96x magnification with 96% coverage. Now, theoretically, this sounds like a much larger image than the stock D2 bodies withstandard eyepiece. For those who use both, is this the case in practice? Which is larger -- the D1 with dk-17m or the D2 without it?

Oh, and by the way...can one use the same focusing screens in the D1 and D2 bodies?


Nikon user since 2000