Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.

English German French

Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries Recent Photos Contest Help Search News Workshops Shop Upgrade Membership Recommended
members
All members Wiki Contests Vouchers Apps Newsletter THE NIKONIAN™ Magazines Podcasts Fundraising

No Anti-Alias filter in Nikon Digital Body?

GilbertC

Taipei
293 posts

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author
GilbertC Registered since 24th Feb 2002
Sun 31-Mar-02 11:02 PM

As a 14-year nikon user I feel I should challenge Nikon consciously.

As stated in Sampling Theory, if sampling rate is not high enough to sample a high frequency signal, a anti-alias filter would be needed to make a proper digital sampling. If not, there would be alias in the sampling result.

Anti-alias filter is basically a low-pass filter that filters out high-frequency portion of the input signal and lets only signals below some certain frequency pass, thus making it possible to sample a unlimited-frequency analog signal with a limited-frequency digitizer. For example to make a music CD, whose sampling rate is 44.1k Hz, we have to first filter out singnals higher than 22.05k Hz and than sample the analog signal with the frequency 44.1k Hz.

The C brand has already been in the music industry for quite a long time so they know to put a anti-alias filter in their upcoming digital camera body. But how about our trusty Nikon? Is there anything designed to take care of the alias problem? If not, is there any reason why Nikon choose not to do some anti-aliasing before digitizing? Or Nikon simply forgets there's a aliasing issue for digital equipment?

Any thoughts?

Gilbert

G