Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.

English German French

Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries Recent Photos Contest Help Search News Workshops Shop Upgrade Membership Recommended
members
All members Wiki Contests Vouchers Apps Newsletter THE NIKONIAN™ Magazines Podcasts Fundraising

Nikon Nikkor 20mm 2.8D vs 20-35mm 2.8D

AgapeLight

Auburn, US
350 posts

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to send message via AOL IM
AgapeLight Silver Member Charter Member
Sat 04-Jun-11 04:54 PM | edited Sat 04-Jun-11 05:05 PM by AgapeLight

I am looking for something to fill in the gap in my lens set and found these two quality lenses have almost the same price in the used market right now, just wondering if anyone has used both and which one you prefer?

I am mainly shooting with a D7K and have an 11-16mm and the new 35mm 1.8G among others. Since the 35mm 1.8G pretty much takes care of the 35mm end of the 20-35, just wondering if the weight and or build is worth it over the light weight 20mm? I should also add that I am trying to shoot more with my F100, and my 11-16 and 35 are both DX lenses, so this would be the only wider lens I could use on my F100. Thanks.

----
Scott Fillmer scott.fillmer@gmail.com>
Blog - http://www.scottfillmer.com



Visit my Nikonians gallery.

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

Subject
ID
Reply message RE: Nikon Nikkor 20mm 2.8D vs 20-35mm 2.8D
1
Reply message RE: Nikon Nikkor 20mm 2.8D vs 20-35mm 2.8D
3
Reply message RE: Nikon Nikkor 20mm 2.8D vs 20-35mm 2.8D
2
Reply message RE: Nikon Nikkor 20mm 2.8D vs 20-35mm 2.8D
4
     Reply message RE: Nikon Nikkor 20mm 2.8D vs 20-35mm 2.8D
5
          Reply message RE: Nikon Nikkor 20mm 2.8D vs 20-35mm 2.8D
6

G