Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.

English German French

Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries Recent Photos Contest Help Search News Workshops Shop Upgrade Membership Recommended
members
All members Wiki Contests Vouchers Apps Newsletter THE NIKONIAN™ Magazines Podcasts Fundraising
dagoldst

Little Rock, US
3089 posts

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author

"RE: Considering Nikon"

dagoldst Gold Member Nikonian since 02nd Dec 2012
Fri 12-Apr-13 04:49 PM


>I've been a Canon shooter for awhile and currently shooting
>with 5Dm2.
>Currently, I'm trying to choose between D600 and D800.
>Here are my considerations:
>1. Since D600 is a consumer body, I'm afraid it's going to
>feel small and not beefy enough, coming from a pro Canon body.

If you have not handled a D600, you ought to do that first before judging its heft and build. It is a weather sealed body and is of hybrid build magnesium/polycarbonate construction - Canon really has nothing like it.

That said, I can't really imagine why you would want to change from the 5D MkII - Do you not have much of a lens investment to consider?

>3. I don't print huge posters, so I don't need 36 MP and those
>huge files do fill up memory cards and hard drive fast. By the
>way, can I just select to use smaller RAW files or shoot at ~
>20-24 MP?

Well, you actually can print poster size with a D600.

Nikon does not downsize RAW files from a pixel perspective - it has either a lossless or lossy compression option on the D600. The only thing that will make a RAW file smaller is if you shoot in the DX crop mode, but as implied by the name, it is not a full frame image, (it is equivalent to the 10mpixels of the old D200 APS size sensor).

>4. Since 5Dm2 has only 9 focus points in the middle of the
>matrix, and realistically, I mostly use center point, I
>believe moving to 51 or even 39 points would be a huge
>improvement.
AF is a very strong point on Nikons.

>5. I'm being a hobbyist, so the price is always a
>consideration. Considering my requirements, is $800 worth the
>difference?

The D800 is a heavy duty Nikon, but then, the D600 is too - 150k rated shutter, 5.5 frames per second, weather sealed, .... - the list goes on and on and it has unbelievable high ISO low light capability along with outstanding resolution - but it is going to be incremental improvement over your Canon gear.

Just a perspective,


David

"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof " - Carl Sagan

A topic tagged as in need of help Considering Nikon [View all] , Aleness , Fri 12-Apr-13 02:32 PM
Subject
ID
Reply message RE: Considering Nikon
1
Reply message RE: Considering Nikon
2
Reply message RE: Considering Nikon
3
Reply message RE: Considering Nikon
4
Reply message RE: Considering Nikon
5
Reply message RE: Considering Nikon
6
     Reply message RE: Considering Nikon
7
     Reply message RE: Considering Nikon
8
     Reply message RE: Considering Nikon
9
          Reply message RE: Considering Nikon
10
               Reply message RE: Considering Nikon
11
     Reply message RE: Considering Nikon
12
          Reply message RE: Considering Nikon
13
               Reply message RE: Considering Nikon
14