Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.

English German French

Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries Recent Photos Contest Help Search News Workshops Shop Upgrade Membership Recommended
members
All members Wiki Contests Vouchers Apps Newsletter THE NIKONIAN™ Magazines Podcasts Fundraising

D600 sensor resolution

MotoMannequin

Livermore, CA, US
8582 posts

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to send message via AOL IM

"RE: D600 sensor resolution"

MotoMannequin Awarded for his extraordinary skills in landscape and wildlife photography Registered since 11th Jan 2006
Mon 17-Sep-12 11:28 PM | edited Mon 17-Sep-12 11:31 PM by MotoMannequin

>You understood my question exactly, Larry.
>
>I apologise for not explaining my original question
>correctly.

Thanks Paul. I'll admit I'm feeling somewhat persecuted in this thread, but I really didn't think you were honestly asking if a 12MP camera had higher resolution than a 24MP camera.

This question does raise an interesting conundrum that faced users during the D3/D300 introduction. A lot of pro shooters were shooting D2x which is a 12MP DX camera, and these people moved to D3 (12MP FX), and were wowed by the image quality. Here's the rub... Many who were shooting wildlife with a 200-400 f/4, suddenly found themselves faced with a choice of either the high-ISO noise of the old D2x, or 5.4MP (DX crop) images from D3, or dump $12K on a 600 f/4; the latter making FX a $20K move! Not to mention trading a moderately hand-holdable lens for an outright behemoth.

At that point, many of us who'd gone with D300, scratched our heads. Of course the D3 + 600/4 would give better IQ than a D300 + 200-400/4, but at the cost of $12K and a tremendous amount of bulk, and always working from a tripod. If any of that causes you to miss a shot, then IQ doesn't exactly matter!

Ultimately, there's a reason why you see more landscape shooters with medium format than wildlife shooters, and this is related to pixel density, or more specifically, getting more pixels on your subject with a smaller lens. In this respect, especially if frame rate is important, there still isn't anything In Nikon's line that touches D300s. Actually, D800 in DX crop mode, with the battery grip, probably does. D7000 is the next closest. D600, offering 5.5fps and a 10.3MP DX crop mode is no slouch, so if you were to use this as an FX camera for most of your uses, and DX wildlife camera for just that, it's not a bad way to go. However, if your primary use is DX/wildlife, I don't see it as a smart option. Still waiting for D400

Larry - a Bay Area Nikonian
My Nikonians gallery

www.tempered-light.com

This is a hot, active topic! D600 sensor resolution [View all] , PRW Silver Member , Mon 17-Sep-12 06:39 AM
Subject
ID
Reply message RE: D600 sensor resolution
1
Reply message RE: D600 sensor resolution
2
Reply message RE: D600 sensor resolution
3
     Reply message RE: D600 sensor resolution
7
          Reply message RE: D600 sensor resolution
9
          Reply message RE: D600 sensor resolution
11
          Reply message RE: D600 sensor resolution
12
          Reply message RE: D600 sensor resolution
10
          Reply message RE: D600 sensor resolution
13
          Reply message RE: D600 sensor resolution
15
Reply message RE: D600 sensor resolution
4
Reply message RE: D600 sensor resolution
17
Reply message RE: D600 sensor resolution
5
Reply message RE: D600 sensor resolution
6
Reply message RE: D600 sensor resolution
8
     Reply message RE: D600 sensor resolution
14
          Reply message RE: D600 sensor resolution
16
               Reply message RE: D600 sensor resolution
18
                    Reply message RE: D600 sensor resolution
19
                         Reply message RE: D600 sensor resolution
20
                              Reply message RE: D600 sensor resolution
21
                                   Reply message RE: D600 sensor resolution
22