Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.

English German French

Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries Recent Photos Contest Help Search News Workshops Shop Upgrade Membership Recommended
members
All members Wiki Contests Vouchers Apps Newsletter THE NIKONIAN™ Magazines Podcasts Fundraising
ericbowles

Atlanta, US
10636 posts

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author

"RE: Why L 0.3, 0.7 1.0?"

ericbowles Moderator Awarded for his in-depth knowledge and high level skills in various areas, especially Landscape and Wildlife Photoghraphy Writer Ribbon awarded for for his article contributions to the community Donor Ribbon awarded for his very generous support to the Fundraising Campaign 2015 Nikonian since 25th Nov 2005
Thu 03-Jan-13 06:28 PM

Base ISO is the optimum ISO for the camera - the ISO with the best overall image quality expressed as a whole stop. That means either ISO 100 or ISO 200 are the choices for base ISO. With one of the recent cameras, the best ISO was actually at Lo 0.3 - but it would never fly from a marketing standpoint and was not published as the base ISO.

Typically ISO levels are rounded and actual measured ISO may be as much as plus or minus 1/3 stop at any given level. The actual ISO levels are almost never the selected values. As you would guess, this means two different cameras might have different exposures at the same settings. DXOMark and Bill Claff have published measured ISO data for each stop.

On the low end, performance typically is still very good at using the Lo ISO levels. The optimum performance varies slightly by camera, but with almost all bodies Lo 1.0 is better than one stop above base ISO. You can freely use Lo ISO levels with minimal adverse impact. I find that for stream photography, Lo 1.0 with a circular polarizer is a very good alternative to a ND filter. I typically use a Lo ISO setting when I want a long exposure even if I add filters.

On the high end maximum ISO is more marketing hype and the highest level Nikon says is acceptable. The high ISO levels are certainly not optimal - they are last resort levels with considerable noise and much weaker color and dynamic range. Hi ISO levels are viable options as a last resort, but generally mean you are willing to trade image quality for shutter speed. I will give Hi 1.0 a shot if I have no choice - but it is truly a "Hail Mary". I might get something good - and its better than no image at all or subject blur.

Eric Bowles
Nikonians Team
My Gallery
Workshops

Nikonians membership — my most important photographic investment, after the camera

A general, generic topic Why L 0.3, 0.7 1.0? [View all] , four eighty sparky , Thu 03-Jan-13 12:53 PM
Subject
ID
Reply message RE: Why L 0.3, 0.7 1.0?
1
Reply message RE: Why L 0.3, 0.7 1.0?
2
     Reply message RE: Why L 0.3, 0.7 1.0?
3
Reply message RE: Why L 0.3, 0.7 1.0?
4
Reply message RE: Why L 0.3, 0.7 1.0?
5
     Reply message RE: Why L 0.3, 0.7 1.0?
6
Reply message RE: Why L 0.3, 0.7 1.0?
7