Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.

English German French

Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries Recent Photos Contest Help Search News Workshops Shop Upgrade Membership Recommended
members
All members Wiki Contests Vouchers Apps Newsletter THE NIKONIAN™ Magazines Podcasts Fundraising
four eighty sparky

US
1653 posts

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author

"RE: Why L 0.3, 0.7 1.0?"

four eighty sparky Registered since 08th Apr 2011
Thu 03-Jan-13 02:31 PM

Well, that kinda sucks. I haven't toyed with the L ratings yet. Am I to expect image quality equal to the H range? If so, using the L settings won't help make silky smooth river shots much easier. Guess I'll stick with NDs and VNDs.

FWIW, I'd love it if I could find a D600-class DSLR with a working ISO range of 10 to say, 1600 max.

____________________________

I hate when people ask me what I see myself doing in 5 years...... I don't have 2020 vision!

Visit my website.

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

A general, generic topic Why L 0.3, 0.7 1.0? [View all] , four eighty sparky , Thu 03-Jan-13 12:53 PM
Subject
ID
Reply message RE: Why L 0.3, 0.7 1.0?
1
Reply message RE: Why L 0.3, 0.7 1.0?
2
     Reply message RE: Why L 0.3, 0.7 1.0?
3
Reply message RE: Why L 0.3, 0.7 1.0?
4
Reply message RE: Why L 0.3, 0.7 1.0?
5
     Reply message RE: Why L 0.3, 0.7 1.0?
6
Reply message RE: Why L 0.3, 0.7 1.0?
7