I am thinking that DX is inevitable for me as I am not a long distance photographer, and the D600 excites me enormously, and the D400 isn't coming and given the D600 has arrived I would never get one. So the D600 is the body I want, however funds are an issue as of now, so i need to find a cash neutral trade.
It seems to me that if I got rid of my DX lenses, which I may as well as I would never use them on a D600 - methinks I would only ever use DX crop at rugby matches, and even then I'd crop in PP, then I would be quite well covered on FX using only my existing primes.
So the question is do I trade the DX lenses and D300 to cover a D600 (maybe plus the new 28mm f/1.8 if funds allow). I hate to let all that glass go, but it's kind of redundant now anyhow, so why not?