Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.

English German French

Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries Recent Photos Contest Help Search News Workshops Shop Upgrade Membership Recommended
members
All members Wiki Contests Vouchers Apps Newsletter THE NIKONIAN™ Magazines Podcasts Fundraising
TomCurious

Bay Area, US
2352 posts

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author

"RE: Here's a question"

TomCurious Registered since 03rd Jan 2007
Thu 01-Mar-12 06:01 AM

The money has already been spent by Nikon in development costs for a sensor that can stream data fast enough for video and an image processor that can handle that data. A model without video would not be cheaper to build. Video would simply be disabled in firmware. The only way for the camera to be cheaper would be if Nikon had developed it without video. I would have preferred that, but I don't worry about things that I can't change.

Tom
Bay Area Nikonian


http://www.tkphoto.me/

A general, generic topic Here's a question [View all] , Roland DG , Wed 29-Feb-12 07:38 PM
Subject
ID
Reply message RE: Here's a question
1
Reply message RE: Here's a question
2
Reply message RE: Here's a question
4
     Reply message RE: Here's a question
5
Reply message RE: Here's a question
3
Reply message RE: Here's a question
6
Reply message RE: Here's a question
7
Reply message RE: Here's a question
8
Reply message RE: Here's a question
9
     Reply message RE: Here's a question
13
Reply message RE: Here's a question
10
Reply message RE: Here's a question
11
Reply message RE: Here's a question
12