Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.

English German French

Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries Recent Photos Contest Help Search News Workshops Shop Upgrade Membership Recommended
members
All members Wiki Contests Vouchers Apps Newsletter THE NIKONIAN™ Magazines Podcasts Fundraising

D800 vs. Leica M 240 - why the D800 wins

Surge75

CA
7 posts

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author

"RE: D800 vs. Leica M 240 - why the D800 wins"

Surge75 Registered since 08th Jul 2013
Wed 10-Jul-13 09:20 PM | edited Wed 10-Jul-13 09:21 PM by Surge75

Would be interested to know why you thought so.

First of, he was wrong is his weight data, saying that the battery weight wasn't included.

Secondly, he is one of the biggest culprits of grossly exaggerating the weight savings of the M. I find it shocking that if you actually do the math and look at what everything weights, the difference is minor, or actually heavier for the M, depending on how you equip.

Certainly, saying that the M is "much" lighter is just poor penmanship.

A general, generic topic D800 vs. Leica M 240 - why the D800 wins [View all] , Surge75 , Wed 10-Jul-13 05:16 PM
Subject
ID
Reply message RE: D800 vs. Leica M 240 - why the D800 wins
1
Reply message RE: D800 vs. Leica M 240 - why the D800 wins
2
     Reply message RE: D800 vs. Leica M 240 - why the D800 wins
3
          Reply message RE: D800 vs. Leica M 240 - why the D800 wins
4
               Reply message RE: D800 vs. Leica M 240 - why the D800 wins
5
Reply message RE: D800 vs. Leica M 240 - why the D800 wins
6
Reply message RE: D800 vs. Leica M 240 - why the D800 wins
7
     Reply message RE: D800 vs. Leica M 240 - why the D800 wins
8
          Reply message RE: D800 vs. Leica M 240 - why the D800 wins
9