Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.

English German French

Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries Recent Photos Contest Help Search News Workshops Shop Upgrade Membership Recommended
members
All members Wiki Contests Vouchers Apps Newsletter THE NIKONIAN™ Magazines Podcasts Fundraising
KnightPhoto

Alberta, CA
4962 posts

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author

"RE: The. Verdict of 36MP"

KnightPhoto Gold Member Nikonian since 18th Dec 2006
Sat 24-Nov-12 04:01 PM

>Stan -- I respect your findings and wonder how you feel about
>the D800 at higher ISOs. I shoot the D700 for a lot of news
>photography, including indoor sports and am just blown away by
>its ability to operate so noise free at 1600, and relatively
>so at 32 and 6400. I'd like to know what you feel about those
>ISOs on your D800. I don't need astronomical ISOs -- the
>25,000 and above. But I have had reservations about 6400,
>which I need in at least two locations I often shoot where I
>shoot basketball at 6400 and get 1/250th at f4. Thanks in
>advance.

I'm having some fun today, processing D800E which I shot in theatre for the first time last night. The first image I selected to show is my daughter at ISO 6400 to show a bit of questionable noise in handling of blue/pink background, it's more noticeable at full size on my computer. I believe my D4 will beat this when I return to shoot another performance. At 1200 pixels wide you can't really see the problem but it's there and would require selective noise reduction.

Then the next image is another actress at ISO 8000 which is more pleasing with black background - Nikon FX cameras have been handling black backgrounds very well for a while now.

I purposely used Jon's tip to up the sharpening amount and reduce the radius (78, 2, 4) which is very high for Capture NX2 and high ISO situations! Basically I wanted to give noise a torture test by sharpening a lot. No noise reduction attempted.

On balance I'd say very good (who am I kidding, a year ago I would have died and gone to heaven with this type of output) and from memory, much better than my D700 which also had some trouble with blue backgrounds. I liked to keep my D700 to ISO 5000 if I could for this reason.

Anyhow, last night was a test and am enjoying processing today. I've only processed 3 photos so far and am only a third of the way through culling so lots more to do.

Third one is just a nice image of my daughter - this one happened to be ISO 8000, and surprises the heck out of me! Hmmm the D800E may be decent after all for these type of wide shots in theatre, looking promising here at early stages...

BTW am also using both these cameras for video in theatre now and so far very good on a different play that I filmed (D4 at 2.7 crop mode with 70-300 for tight composition and D800E with 70-200 at normal crop for wider stage view) . I shoot them both concurrently which can be a bit of a challenge, and intercut them in post. Will be videoing this play on Wednesday night and looking forward to it!

Best regards, SteveK

'A camera is an instrument that teaches people how to see without a camera.' -- Dorothea Lange
My Nikonians gallery
My Nikonians Blog

Click on image to view larger version



Click on image to view larger version



Click on image to view larger version

Attachment#1 (jpg file)
Attachment#2 (jpg file)
Attachment#3 (jpg file)

This is a hot, active topic! The. Verdict of 36MP [View all] , JCY88 , Mon 19-Nov-12 07:12 PM
Subject
ID
Reply message RE: The. Verdict of 36MP
1
Reply message RE: The. Verdict of 36MP
2
Reply message RE: The. Verdict of 36MP
3
     Reply message RE: The. Verdict of 36MP
6
Reply message RE: The. Verdict of 36MP
4
Reply message RE: The. Verdict of 36MP
7
     Reply message RE: The. Verdict of 36MP
10
     Reply message RE: The. Verdict of 36MP
30
     Reply message RE: The. Verdict of 36MP
22
     Reply message RE: The. Verdict of 36MP
29
     Reply message RE: The. Verdict of 36MP
36
          Reply message RE: The. Verdict of 36MP
40
          Reply message RE: The. Verdict of 36MP
41
               Reply message RE: The. Verdict of 36MP
42
          Reply message RE: The. Verdict of 36MP
43
               Reply message RE: The. Verdict of 36MP
49
     Reply message RE: The. Verdict of 36MP
47
          Reply message RE: The. Verdict of 36MP
50
Reply message RE: The. Verdict of 36MP
8
Reply message RE: The. Verdict of 36MP
9
Reply message RE: The. Verdict of 36MP
11
Reply message RE: The. Verdict of 36MP
12
Reply message RE: The. Verdict of 36MP
13
     Reply message RE: The. Verdict of 36MP
14
Reply message RE: The Verdict of 36MP - post sharpening not as effect...
15
Reply message RE: The. Verdict of 36MP
16
Reply message RE: The. Verdict of 36MP
17
Reply message RE: The. Verdict of 36MP
18
Reply message RE: The. Verdict of 36MP
19
Reply message RE: The. Verdict of 36MP
20
Reply message RE: The. Verdict of 36MP
21
Reply message RE: The. Verdict of 36MP
23
Reply message RE: The. Verdict of 36MP
24
Reply message RE: The. Verdict of 36MP
25
Reply message RE: The. Verdict of 36MP
26
Reply message RE: The. Verdict of 36MP
37
     Reply message RE: The. Verdict of 36MP
46
          Reply message RE: The. Verdict of 36MP
48
Reply message RE: The. Verdict of 36MP
31
Reply message RE: The. Verdict of 36MP
27
Reply message RE: The. Verdict of 36MP
28
     Reply message RE: The. Verdict of 36MP
32
          Reply message RE: The. Verdict of 36MP
34
Reply message RE: The. Verdict of 36MP
33
Reply message RE: The. Verdict of 36MP
35
Reply message RE: The. Verdict of 36MP
39
Reply message RE: The. Verdict of 36MP
38
Reply message RE: The. Verdict of 36MP
44
Reply message RE: The. Verdict of 36MP
45
Reply message RE: The. Verdict of 36MP
51
     Reply message RE: The. Verdict of 36MP
52
          Reply message RE: The. Verdict of 36MP
53
Reply message RE: The. Verdict of 36MP
54
Reply message RE: The. Verdict of 36MP
55
Reply message RE: The. Verdict of 36MP
56
     Reply message RE: The. Verdict of 36MP
58
Reply message RE: The. Verdict of 36MP
60
Reply message RE: The. Verdict of 36MP
59