Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.

English German French

Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries Recent Photos Contest Help Search News Workshops Shop Upgrade Membership Recommended
members
All members Wiki Contests Vouchers Apps Newsletter THE NIKONIAN™ Magazines Podcasts Fundraising
dm1dave

Lowden, US
13639 posts

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author

"RE: D7000 review"

dm1dave Administrator Awarded for high level knowledge and skills in various areas, most notably in Wildlife and Landscape Writer Ribbon awarded for his excellent article contributions to the Nikonians community Donor Ribbon awarded for his very generous support to the Fundraising Campaign 2015 Nikonian since 12th Sep 2006
Sun 17-Oct-10 11:33 PM | edited Sun 17-Oct-10 11:36 PM by dm1dave

To Dave: There are some ways how a camera can affect sharpness: mirror slap vibration, AA filter (as you said), diffraction (increased by high pixel density).

Yes but none of these things (except an over aggressive AA filter, which is very unlikely) will make the camera body inherently soft. Mirror slap is a technique issue, every DSLR has a AA filter and diffraction would have to be pretty bad to make a tangible difference. Inherent softness is the least likely shortfall of this or any other modern DSLR body.

My main point was that that we have seen this issue has come up over and over in the past with every increase in pixel density and the complaints always disappear as soon as the users adjust their technique to the new body.

“All this said, I did not take the sharpness complaint too seriously…”

This reviewer repeated the sharpness complaint a couple of times so he must think it is serious. His example images, as examples of sharpness or high ISO performance, are questionable to say the least. He seems to be just some guy with a blog who wiped out a quick review without based on very limited use of the camera. So again this is a case where we need to review the reviewer. Has he given other reviews in the past? Have hey been accurate? Has he shown that he has done any controlled and or through testing or are these just off the cuff remarks?

Although he seems to be a very good photographer, based on his online portfolio, he may not be a very good or reliable reviewer.

Give it a couple of months and we will here less and less people saying “The D7000 is soft.”

Dave Summers
Nikonians Photo Contest Director
My Nikonians Gallery | Current Nikonians Contests

Click on image to view larger version

A general, generic topic D7000 review [View all] , TomCurious , Sun 17-Oct-10 03:49 PM
Subject
ID
Reply message RE: D7000 review
1
Reply message RE: D7000 review
2
Reply message RE: D7000 review
3
     Reply message RE: D7000 review
15
Reply message RE: D7000 review
4
Reply message RE: D7000 review
5
Reply message RE: D7000 review
6
Reply message RE: D7000 review
7
Reply message RE: D7000 review
8
Reply message RE: D7000 review
9
Reply message RE: D7000 review
10
     Reply message RE: D7000 review
11
          Reply message RE: D7000 review
12
Reply message RE: D7000 review
13
Reply message RE: D7000 review
14
Reply message RE: D7000 review
16
     Reply message RE: D7000 review
17