Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.

English German French

Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries Recent Photos Contest Help Search News Workshops Shop Upgrade Membership Recommended
members
All members Wiki Contests Vouchers Apps Newsletter THE NIKONIAN™ Magazines Podcasts Fundraising
km6xz

St Petersburg, RU
3577 posts

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author

"RE: D7000 review"

km6xz Moderator Awarded for his in-depth knowledge in various areas, including Portraits and Urban Photography Nikonian since 22nd Jan 2009
Sun 17-Oct-10 08:33 PM | edited Sun 17-Oct-10 08:34 PM by km6xz

The problem is he did not use the same settings he did for the d90. A common complaint at first with the D90 was softness compared to the prior cameras in default settings. Everyone quickly learned to increase PC sharpening and suddenly the bad camera turned into the class leader.
He admitted he only set it at 5 which is the default for standard so even setting it at 6 would have compensated for the AA filter better.
A person on DPR posted images set at 6 and they were beautiful, whereas those who used default settings were seeing soft images, just like we did with the D90 when it was introduced. Using RAW, which I do exclusively now, every D90 shot during import is automatically sharpened in my import profile in Light Room 3 to make it closer to the sharpness of the JPG images with the PC Standard set at 6 in the camera.

Another issue is conversion software just does not exist yet that is optimized for the D7000. Only the CD version of ViewNX even allows adjustment to sharpening, the download version does not. Without the correct profiles present in converters there is no telling what the renderings will turn out like.
It is interesting how the complaint of outer focus points are not as good at locking as the D700 but the middle cross points are, without mentioning that the "outer" points are really covering a greater portion of the frame than the D700 which clusters all tightly into the center area with none further out. He said when comparing the center columns, the D7000 did compare. So as to compare apples to apples, comparing the areas both cameras have in common makes more sense.
I would say the review is more flawed than useful.
Stan
St Petersburg Russia

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

A general, generic topic D7000 review [View all] , TomCurious , Sun 17-Oct-10 03:49 PM
Subject
ID
Reply message RE: D7000 review
1
Reply message RE: D7000 review
2
Reply message RE: D7000 review
3
     Reply message RE: D7000 review
15
Reply message RE: D7000 review
4
Reply message RE: D7000 review
5
Reply message RE: D7000 review
6
Reply message RE: D7000 review
7
Reply message RE: D7000 review
8
Reply message RE: D7000 review
9
Reply message RE: D7000 review
10
     Reply message RE: D7000 review
11
          Reply message RE: D7000 review
12
Reply message RE: D7000 review
13
Reply message RE: D7000 review
14
Reply message RE: D7000 review
16
     Reply message RE: D7000 review
17