Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.

English German French

Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries Recent Photos Contest Help Search News Workshops Shop Upgrade Membership Recommended
members
All members Wiki Contests Vouchers Apps Newsletter THE NIKONIAN™ Magazines Podcasts Fundraising
luckyphoto

Port Charlotte, US
1050 posts

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author

"RE: Magnetic fields"

luckyphoto Silver Member Nikonian since 27th Dec 2010
Sun 23-Jun-13 11:03 AM

From a strictly theoretical perspective it would be the inverse square law if the magnet field was generated by a monopole source. However, in reality, magnets are two poles and so the field decay calculation is more complicated and can range to an inverse cubed decay or more depending on where you are in relationship to the composite field and the shape of the field (could be multiple poles - 4, 6, 8, etc).

If there were strong residual magnetic fields, warning signs would probably be in place. Your camera should be fine

Larry

"Red is gray and yellow white, but we decide which is right
....and which is an illusion"

Moody Blues - Nights in White Satin

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

A general, generic topic Magnetic fields [View all] , RobertK Silver Member , Fri 21-Jun-13 10:27 AM
Subject
ID
Reply message RE: Magnetic fields
1
Reply message RE: Magnetic fields
2
Reply message RE: Magnetic fields
3
Reply message RE: Magnetic fields
4