Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.

English German French

Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries Recent Photos Contest Help Search News Workshops Shop Upgrade Membership Recommended
members
All members Wiki Contests Vouchers Apps Newsletter THE NIKONIAN™ Magazines Podcasts Fundraising

D7100 buffer guesstimates

dagoldst

Little Rock, US
3076 posts

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author

"RE: According to IR the D7100 supports them..."

dagoldst Gold Member Nikonian since 02nd Dec 2012
Mon 11-Mar-13 12:44 AM

Jim,

If the D7100 uses the same SD I/O chip as the D600, then when the buffer is full, the frame rate at full sensor size/color depth will fall to... 45Mbytes/sec. That is roughly 1 frame per second.

David

"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof " - Carl Sagan

A general, generic topic D7100 buffer guesstimates [View all] , jbloom Gold Member Awarded for the continuous and generous sharing of his high level expertise and his always encouraging comments in several forums. Donor Ribbon awarded for his generous support to the Fundraising Campaign 2014 , Mon 04-Mar-13 02:08 PM
Subject
ID
Reply message It doesn't seem to work like that...
1
Reply message RE: It doesn't seem to work like that...
2
     Reply message Compressibility could be a big variable...
3
Reply message RE: D7100 buffer guesstimates
4
Reply message RE: D7100 buffer guesstimates
12
Reply message RE: D7100 buffer guesstimates
5
Reply message RE: D7100 buffer guesstimates
6
Reply message RE: D7100 buffer guesstimates
7
     Reply message RE: D7100 buffer guesstimates
8
Reply message RE: D7100 buffer guesstimates
9
Reply message RE: D7100 buffer guesstimates
10
     Reply message RE: D7100 buffer guesstimates
11
          Reply message According to IR the D7100 supports them...
13
               Reply message RE: According to IR the D7100 supports them...
14
                    Reply message I'm going by Nikon's numbers here...
15
                         Reply message RE: I'm going by Nikon's numbers here...
16