Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.

English German French

Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries Recent Photos Contest Help Search News Workshops Shop Upgrade Membership Recommended
members
All members Wiki Contests Vouchers Apps Newsletter THE NIKONIAN™ Magazines Podcasts Fundraising

Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking

MasterDabber

Camberley, UK
3320 posts

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author

"RE: Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking"

MasterDabber Registered since 10th Dec 2005
Sat 12-Jan-13 05:03 PM

Thanks for the feedback John. And yes, I live on a road with a 40 mph speed limit so that would be a good test with the cars.

I took some Tour de France shots from one of the stages in 2012 and hope to do it again in the future. However, that was with my old D50 so now with the D7000 I'd like to maximise my efforts and use it to the best of its (my) capabilities. In the meantime I'd like to capture some of my cycle club's races.

Derek

"You might think that, I couldn't possibly comment"
My Gallery
My Nikonians Gallery

A general, generic topic Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking [View all] , Nikon32250 Silver Member , Fri 11-Jan-13 01:40 PM
Subject
ID
Reply message RE: Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking
1
Reply message RE: Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking
2
Reply message RE: Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking
3
Reply message RE: Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking
4
     Reply message RE: Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking
5
          Reply message RE: Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking
6
               Reply message RE: Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking
7
               Reply message RE: Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking
8
               Reply message RE: Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking
12
               Reply message RE: Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking
10
                    Reply message RE: Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking
11
               Reply message RE: Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking
9