Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.

English German French

Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries Recent Photos Contest Help Search News Workshops Shop Upgrade Membership Recommended
members
All members Wiki Contests Vouchers Apps Newsletter THE NIKONIAN™ Magazines Podcasts Fundraising

Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking

Gamecocks

Joanna, US
986 posts

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author

"RE: Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking"

Gamecocks Registered since 22nd Jul 2010
Sat 12-Jan-13 12:03 PM

Hi Derek,

I've used that combo while doing drag races and have gotten very good results. You can pan and get the type shot, some blur or none depending on the pan, and adjust your aperture for dof or shutter speed to get that perfect shot. If you live near an interstate you could experiment with different settings to find a common starting point; just a thought. Good luck.

Nobody should seek his own good, but the good of others. <><

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

A general, generic topic Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking [View all] , Nikon32250 Silver Member , Fri 11-Jan-13 01:40 PM
Subject
ID
Reply message RE: Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking
1
Reply message RE: Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking
2
Reply message RE: Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking
3
Reply message RE: Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking
4
     Reply message RE: Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking
5
          Reply message RE: Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking
6
               Reply message RE: Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking
7
               Reply message RE: Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking
8
               Reply message RE: Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking
12
               Reply message RE: Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking
10
                    Reply message RE: Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking
11
               Reply message RE: Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking
9