Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.

English German French

Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries Recent Photos Contest Help Search News Workshops Shop Upgrade Membership Recommended
members
All members Wiki Contests Vouchers Apps Newsletter THE NIKONIAN™ Magazines Podcasts Fundraising

Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking

karanjikar

CN
4 posts

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author

"RE: Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking"

karanjikar Registered since 25th Nov 2012
Sat 12-Jan-13 01:23 AM

With my limited experience I also agree about single point focus..

I tend to think that single point focus would be better in most situations where the central object is well defined.

I tried to use 3D tracking, 21 pt AF and single pt AF for wild life & birds and think that single pt AF gave me the best results in terms of sharpness.

A general, generic topic Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking [View all] , Nikon32250 Silver Member , Fri 11-Jan-13 01:40 PM
Subject
ID
Reply message RE: Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking
1
Reply message RE: Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking
2
Reply message RE: Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking
3
Reply message RE: Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking
4
     Reply message RE: Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking
5
          Reply message RE: Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking
6
               Reply message RE: Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking
7
               Reply message RE: Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking
8
               Reply message RE: Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking
12
               Reply message RE: Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking
10
                    Reply message RE: Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking
11
               Reply message RE: Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking
9