Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.

English German French

Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries Recent Photos Contest Help Search News Workshops Shop Upgrade Membership Recommended
members
All members Wiki Contests Vouchers Apps Newsletter THE NIKONIAN™ Magazines Podcasts Fundraising

Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking

Nikon32250

St. Augustine, US
4033 posts

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author

"RE: Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking"

Nikon32250 Silver Member Nikonian since 16th Mar 2004
Fri 11-Jan-13 11:20 PM

Marc

It is interesting that you mentioned about using single point. The other day I was watching one of the college bowl games, and the cameraman had a still photographer in the picture who was using a D3. I froze the picture to look at his settings and he was using single point. In the past I have also used single point, but I had been wondering if I would do a better job with one of the other settings. Now it looks like I was probably using the best setting all along.

Graham
From St. Augustine, FL. "I like photographers, you don't ask questions." Ronald Reagan to White House Press Photogs

http://www.ancientcityphotography.com/>

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

A general, generic topic Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking [View all] , Nikon32250 Silver Member , Fri 11-Jan-13 01:40 PM
Subject
ID
Reply message RE: Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking
1
Reply message RE: Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking
2
Reply message RE: Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking
3
Reply message RE: Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking
4
     Reply message RE: Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking
5
          Reply message RE: Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking
6
               Reply message RE: Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking
7
               Reply message RE: Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking
8
               Reply message RE: Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking
12
               Reply message RE: Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking
10
                    Reply message RE: Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking
11
               Reply message RE: Dynamic area AF versus 3D tracking
9