Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.

English German French

Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries Recent Photos Contest Help Search News Workshops Shop Upgrade Membership Recommended
members
All members Wiki Contests Vouchers Apps Newsletter THE NIKONIAN™ Magazines Podcasts Fundraising

D7000 & Future of FX

elec164

US
2578 posts

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author

"RE: D7000 & Future of FX"

elec164 Silver Member Nikonian since 15th Jan 2009
Sat 18-Sep-10 09:58 PM

>
>The disadvantage is processing time. It takes longer to
>compress files, so your buffer empties much slower. Some older
>cameras, like the D1x even with buffer upgrade, are useless in
>compressed NEF mode for most uses due to this.

In my opinion the processing time is negligible. Besides I thought the image that hits the buffer is already processed and that file size and write speeds become the bottleneck. If processing were an issue then wouldn’t storing JPEG’s affect the frame rates? Yet I believe the frame rate remains constant and the amount of images stored in the buffer before slow down increases.

Or am I misunderstanding this process?

Pete

Pete

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

This is a hot, active topic! D7000 & Future of FX [View all] , DaynLarz Silver Member , Thu 16-Sep-10 02:11 PM
Subject
ID
Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
1
Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
2
Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
27
     Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
28
          Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
29
Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
3
Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
4
Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
5
Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
7
     Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
10
     Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
26
Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
6
Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
8
     Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
9
Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
11
Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
12
Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
13
     Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
14
          Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
15
          Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
16
               Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
17
                    Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
18
          Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
21
          Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
24
Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
19
Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
20
Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
25
Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
22
Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
23
Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
30
     Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
31
     Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
32
          Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
33
          Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
34
          Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
35
               Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
36
                    Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
37
                         Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
38
          Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
41
     Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
39
Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
40
Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
42
Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
43
     Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
44
          Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
45
               Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
46
                    Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
47
                         Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
48