Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.

English German French

Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries Recent Photos Contest Help Search News Workshops Shop Upgrade Membership Recommended
members
All members Wiki Contests Vouchers Apps Newsletter THE NIKONIAN™ Magazines Podcasts Fundraising

D7000 & Future of FX

km6xz

St Petersburg, RU
3559 posts

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author

"RE: D7000 & Future of FX"

km6xz Moderator Awarded for his in-depth knowledge in various areas, including Portraits and Urban Photography Nikonian since 22nd Jan 2009
Fri 17-Sep-10 04:04 AM

I am sure the OP is correct in assuming a lot of people will question their need to move to FX, that is if their main purpose was lower noise at high ISO. That was my main reason for creating a savings jar to get a D3s. I did not like the idea of having change most of my lenses but did want the low light performance a great deal.
Otherwise I am quite happy with the D90, with the grip it feels great in the hand, balances well with 70-200 and works very well. I was never bothered by having a few items on the menu, for event and club shooting, I never go to the menu, all I ever need is right on the body of the camera without removing my eye from the VF. I surely get more keepers and do less fiddling with menus than my friends shooting 7D and 5DII in the same events. If I really needed AF mode control, as a dedicated control, the only thing that is missing from this level of camera but present in a Pro unit, I can program the function button to rotate through the choices.
So for me, the D7k is a very exciting new toy that I can afford, plus possibly the 24-70 I've been wanting, and maybe the 85 1.4 AF-S to replace my 17-55 and 85 1.4D and have enough money left over for a nice vacation from what is in the jar now.
Without the grip, the D90/D7k are a little small for me now but when I first got it it was perfect. The difference is now I keep it in hand for 5-8 hours some nights and it just feels more secure and comfortable with the grip, hand strap and RS-5, usually with a 70-200 attached. When playing with the D3s, I found that it was a lot lighter and compact than I imagined, great feel, but not much different in weight and size than the D90 with grip. Both such set ups feel better, to me than the D300/D700 class body without the grip.

I think the mass of the market is in the mid and entry line, which has a lot more reason to see the D7k as a game changer than those who already have FX glass. So, this camera really is very significant for possibly millions of people despite not having much appeal for the hundreds of thousands who have FX now. So there really should be no impact on either class of camera, the masses, like me will be happy with the D7k and those who want a larger body with a couple more buttons will not change, their upgrade path is secure, but just at a slower release cycle. There enough difference in the product lines to appeal to two different users. One class just happens to be 10 times larger so this cycle got the most attention this time. In the spring the buzz on other brand forums will be about trying to find some faults in the new Fx body just announced or leaked.
Nikon is definitely on the right track and causing some hand wringing in boardrooms in Asia. Canon is likely to get its bread and butter mid line eaten for lunch.
Stan
St Petersburg Russia

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

This is a hot, active topic! D7000 & Future of FX [View all] , DaynLarz Silver Member , Thu 16-Sep-10 02:11 PM
Subject
ID
Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
1
Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
2
Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
27
     Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
28
          Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
29
Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
3
Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
4
Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
5
Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
7
     Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
10
     Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
26
Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
6
Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
8
     Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
9
Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
11
Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
12
Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
13
     Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
14
          Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
15
          Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
16
               Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
17
                    Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
18
          Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
21
          Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
24
Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
19
Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
20
Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
25
Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
22
Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
23
Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
30
     Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
31
     Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
32
          Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
33
          Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
34
          Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
35
               Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
36
                    Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
37
                         Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
38
          Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
41
     Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
39
Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
40
Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
42
Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
43
     Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
44
          Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
45
               Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
46
                    Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
47
                         Reply message RE: D7000 & Future of FX
48