Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.

English German French

Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries Recent Photos Contest Help Search News Workshops Shop Upgrade Membership Recommended
members
All members Wiki Contests Vouchers Apps Newsletter THE NIKONIAN™ Magazines Podcasts Fundraising

First SLR, 3200 or 3100 - ISO performance?

lakey

US
4 posts

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author

"RE: First SLR, 3200 or 3100 - ISO performance?"

lakey Registered since 26th Mar 2012
Mon 21-May-12 11:47 PM

I was like you and did alot of research. I bought the 3100 and the 3100 for Dummies to make sure I would learn all the uses of my camera.
I had a SLR from the school I was teaching in so I knew some of the basics. The 3100 will be a challange to learn all I need and to save for the extra lenses I want to purchase. You can research forever or just go for something and start using it. The learning process is fun.

A general, generic topic First SLR, 3200 or 3100 - ISO performance? [View all] , Zeya , Thu 10-May-12 08:29 PM
Subject
ID
Reply message RE: First SLR, 3200 or 3100 - ISO performance?
1
Reply message RE: First SLR, 3200 or 3100 - ISO performance?
2
Reply message RE: First SLR, 3200 or 3100 - ISO performance?
3
Reply message RE: First SLR, 3200 or 3100 - ISO performance?
4
Reply message RE: First SLR, 3200 or 3100 - ISO performance?
5
     Reply message RE: First SLR, 3200 or 3100 - ISO performance?
6
          Reply message RE: First SLR, 3200 or 3100 - ISO performance?
7
Reply message RE: First SLR, 3200 or 3100 - ISO performance?
8
Reply message RE: First SLR, 3200 or 3100 - ISO performance?
9
     Reply message RE: First SLR, 3200 or 3100 - ISO performance?
10
Reply message RE: First SLR, 3200 or 3100 - ISO performance?
11