Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.

English German French

Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries Recent Photos Contest Help Search News Workshops Shop Upgrade Membership Recommended
members
All members Wiki Contests Vouchers Apps Newsletter THE NIKONIAN™ Magazines Podcasts Fundraising

First SLR, 3200 or 3100 - ISO performance?

Zeya

US
3 posts

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author

"RE: First SLR, 3200 or 3100 - ISO performance?"

Zeya Registered since 10th May 2012
Mon 14-May-12 06:04 PM

Well, I'm taking another look at the d5100 now. It seems that people really like it because it has the same sensor and processing as the d7000, so very good IQ for the price. Other advantages of the d5100 over the 3100/3200 would be exposure bracketing, on-camera HDR, and the pop-out screen, which I think might be nice for tripod shots, especially down low so you could angle it upwards.

Also, I don't know why I thought the 5100 cost more than the 3200 - it's about the same price.

A general, generic topic First SLR, 3200 or 3100 - ISO performance? [View all] , Zeya , Thu 10-May-12 08:29 PM
Subject
ID
Reply message RE: First SLR, 3200 or 3100 - ISO performance?
1
Reply message RE: First SLR, 3200 or 3100 - ISO performance?
2
Reply message RE: First SLR, 3200 or 3100 - ISO performance?
3
Reply message RE: First SLR, 3200 or 3100 - ISO performance?
4
Reply message RE: First SLR, 3200 or 3100 - ISO performance?
5
     Reply message RE: First SLR, 3200 or 3100 - ISO performance?
6
          Reply message RE: First SLR, 3200 or 3100 - ISO performance?
7
Reply message RE: First SLR, 3200 or 3100 - ISO performance?
8
Reply message RE: First SLR, 3200 or 3100 - ISO performance?
9
     Reply message RE: First SLR, 3200 or 3100 - ISO performance?
10
Reply message RE: First SLR, 3200 or 3100 - ISO performance?
11