Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.

English German French

Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries Recent Photos Contest Help Search News Workshops Shop Upgrade Membership Recommended
All members Wiki Contests Vouchers Apps Newsletter THE NIKONIAN™ Magazines Podcasts Fundraising

Livermore, CA, US
8582 posts

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to send message via AOL IM

"RE: D5000 vs. D40"

MotoMannequin Awarded for his extraordinary skills in landscape and wildlife photography Registered since 11th Jan 2006
Mon 17-Aug-09 06:32 AM | edited Mon 17-Aug-09 06:33 AM by MotoMannequin


The D40 is an excellent camera, and for your purpose, probably either D40 or D5K would be fine. I agree it probably isn't a worthwhile upgrade for your stated purpose.

Regarding the issue of noise, similar issues were hotly discussed over a year ago, comparing D300 to D50 (again a 12MP camera compared to 6MP camera). In casual snaps, the D50 looked superior, but when we actually got down to doing well-controlled tests, the D300 won by a large margin. You can probably dig up the old threads in the D300 forum if you like.

If you were shooting with ADL on, then that explains the poor shadow noise performance. ADL underexposes the image to protect highlights, then applies d-lighting to raise shadows in post processing. If you do this in any camera, you've got a recipe for shadow noise, and that's precisely the effect. This may be a contentious statement, but I don't find ADL useful for anything but casual snapshots.

Larry - a Bay Area Nikonian
My Nikonians gallery


A general, generic topic D5000 vs. D40 [View all] , TomCurious , Sat 15-Aug-09 11:56 PM
Reply message RE: D5000 vs. D40
Reply message RE: D5000 vs. D40
Reply message RE: D5000 vs. D40
     Reply message RE: D5000 vs. D40
          Reply message RE: D5000 vs. D40