Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.

English German French

Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries Recent Photos Contest Help Search News Workshops Shop Upgrade Membership Recommended
members
All members Wiki Contests Vouchers Apps Newsletter THE NIKONIAN™ Magazines Podcasts Fundraising
MotoMannequin

Livermore, CA, US
8582 posts

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to send message via AOL IM

"RE: D700s"

MotoMannequin Awarded for his extraordinary skills in landscape and wildlife photography Registered since 11th Jan 2006
Mon 12-Mar-12 04:56 PM | edited Mon 12-Mar-12 04:58 PM by MotoMannequin

Nikon can't continue to sell D700 in Japan due to new Li-ion battery regulations. It looks like the next-gen cameras were slated to replace all cameras using the old battery, so Nikon probably intended the D700 to phase out. But, Nikon hit a snag in making the D800 so revolutionary, they took it completely out of the same user bracket as D700, which got some D700 users up in arms.

Anyway, now it looks like at a stopgap for this issue, Nikon will continue to produce the D700 for sale outside Japan. I can't imagine however that this is considered a good long-term solution for Nikon, as they should eventually want to get all the new cameras onto the same battery platform, and the stopgap does nothing for customers in the mother country.

Nikon's strategy long-term must either be to hope people stop wanting a D700-style camera, or to introduce a new FX camera tier somewhere around the $2000 price point, which puts it very close to D300s (D400) territory. With the D7000 moving up-market from D90 by adding a magnesium shell, weatherproofing, and additional external controls, this raises a question of where the D400 fits between D7000 & D700 replacement, which squeeze this segment from both ends. The D400 could be D7000 sensor in a new semi-pro body, it could be a higher-density (24MP) DX sensor, or it could be a D4 (FX) sensor with less speed, which would make D400 logically replace the D700. Given the D7K has been out for 18 months, I think if the D400 simply adopted this sensor, we'd have D400 already. Of the latter 2 options, I'm thinking more and more a 16MP FX D400 might make the most sense, although this eliminates the high-speed DX camera which would be a loss I'd personally mourn.

Larry - a Bay Area Nikonian
My Nikonians gallery

www.tempered-light.com

This is a hot, active topic! D700s [View all] , Devonish , Mon 12-Mar-12 01:40 PM
Subject
ID
Reply message RE: D700s
1
Reply message RE: D700s
3
Reply message RE: D700s
2
Reply message RE: D700s
4
     Reply message RE: D700s
5
          Reply message RE: D700s
6
          Reply message RE: D700s
8
          Reply message RE: D700s
7
Reply message RE: D700s
9
Reply message RE: D700s
12
Reply message RE: D700s
13
Reply message RE: D700s
14
     Reply message RE: D700s
16
Reply message RE: D700s
29
     Reply message RE: D700s
30
Reply message RE: D700s
15
Reply message RE: D700s
17
Reply message RE: D700s
18
     Reply message RE: D700s
22
     Reply message RE: D700s
28
     Reply message RE: D700s
26
     Reply message RE: D700s
27
Reply message RE: D700s
11
Reply message RE: D700s
19
Reply message RE: D700s
20
Reply message RE: D700s
21
     Reply message RE: D700s
23
          Reply message RE: D700s
24
          Reply message RE: D700s
25
               Reply message RE: D700s
32
                    Reply message RE: D700s
33
                         Reply message RE: D700s
34
                         Reply message RE: D700s
36
                         Reply message RE: D700s
35
                              Reply message RE: D700s
39
Reply message RE: D700s
37
Reply message RE: D700s
38