Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.

English German French

Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries Recent Photos Contest Help Search News Workshops Shop Upgrade Membership Recommended
members
All members Wiki Contests Vouchers Apps Newsletter THE NIKONIAN™ Magazines Podcasts Fundraising

FX vs DX and Wide Angle

Valentino

US
11613 posts

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author

"RE: FX vs DX and Wide Angle"

Valentino Awarded for high level skills in landscape and wildlife photography Registered since 04th Dec 2004
Fri 04-Jul-08 08:56 PM

Thanks and glad you liked the shot.

Dx and Fx each have their virtues and have co-existed in the Canon line for years yet as I understand it, FF DSLR's are still less than 10% of their line. I do agree that the cost of sensors will come down in accord with Moore's law like every other chip has doen but I cannot see any reason for Dx to fade away over time. For wildlife shooters in the Canon camp their Id Mark III has a 1.6 crop and is only 10mp and the DSLR's of choice.

As for what Nikon plans are for Dx lenses I do not know. Dx lenses are only needed for the wide end with FL starting at less than 24mm to be more telecentric for the microlenses in the sensor. Computer aided designs of lenses are allowing significant improvements in the optical fomulas of only a few years ago plus we now has nano-coating. It simple make cents (and dollars or yen) for Nikon to replace these lenses for the simple reason that people will buy them and Nikon will make money. Nikon's 12-24 is the oldest design for a superzoom. Nikon's 17-55 is a great lens but really needs nano coating since my only complaint is flare. If Nikon can engineer a 17-70 f/2.8 DX it would certainly sell since 70mm is a good portrait length for DX. I now use my 35-70 f/2.8 for that.

I don't know what they are thinking or will do in the years to come but so far, when they build it, NAS kicks in the people buy it.

Albert J Valentino
Nikonian Moderator Emeritus

Vantage Point Images
Mastery of Composition is the Key to Great Photography

This is a hot, active topic! FX vs DX and Wide Angle [View all] , Valentino Awarded for high level skills in landscape and wildlife photography , Wed 02-Jul-08 11:28 AM
Subject
ID
Reply message RE: FX vs DX and Wide Angle
1
Reply message RE: FX vs DX and Wide Angle
2
     Reply message RE: FX vs DX and Wide Angle
3
          Reply message RE: FX vs DX and Wide Angle
4
          Reply message RE: FX vs DX and Wide Angle
6
          Reply message RE: FX vs DX and Wide Angle
7
Reply message RE: FX vs DX and Wide Angle
5
Reply message RE: FX vs DX and Wide Angle
8
Reply message RE: FX vs DX and Wide Angle
9
Reply message RE: FX vs DX and Wide Angle
10
Reply message RE: FX vs DX and Wide Angle
11
Reply message RE: FX vs DX and Wide Angle
12
     Reply message RE: FX vs DX and Wide Angle
13
Reply message As wide as it gets on DX
14
Reply message RE: As wide as it gets on DX
15
Reply message RE: FX vs DX and Wide Angle
16
Reply message RE: FX vs DX and Wide Angle
17
     Reply message RE: FX vs DX and Wide Angle
18
          Reply message RE: FX vs DX and Wide Angle
19
               Reply message RE: FX vs DX and Wide Angle
20
               Reply message RE: FX vs DX and Wide Angle
21
               Reply message RE: FX vs DX and Wide Angle
23
Reply message RE: FX vs DX and Wide Angle
22
Reply message RE: FX vs DX and Wide Angle
24
Reply message RE: FX vs DX and Wide Angle
25
Reply message RE: FX vs DX and Wide Angle
26