Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.

English German French

Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries Recent Photos Contest Help Search News Workshops Shop Upgrade Membership Recommended
members
All members Wiki Contests Vouchers Apps Newsletter THE NIKONIAN™ Magazines Podcasts Fundraising

FX vs DX and Wide Angle

blw

Richmond, US
28560 posts

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to send message via AOL IM

"RE: FX vs DX and Wide Angle"

blw Moderator Awarded for his high level of expertise in various areas Nikonian since 18th Jun 2004
Thu 03-Jul-08 02:14 AM

> FX allows 60 years worth of lenses to be used that way they were designed

Does it matter? I commonly use a 35/f1.4 as a normal lens instead of a 50/f1.4. I seriously doubt that the lens cares, and probably neither does Nikon. Nor do I.

It's not really true, anyway. Many of the designs are actually visibly dated on the denser sensors, which is where most CA crops up, and other various optical evils appear - precisely where their designers never intended that they go.

And I know this is mostly about wide angle, but in the telephoto and macro areas, the lenses often do NOT work all that much as they were intended. I'm thinking mostly of TCs and extension tubes, where I am in the process of collecting two sets of tubes (one for AF and one for MF), and at least two and potentially even three sets of TCs (Nikkor AFS lenses, Sigma HSM lenses, and potentially something for AIS monsters).

_____
Brian... a bicoastal Nikonian and Team Member

My gallery is online. Comments and critique welcomed any time!

This is a hot, active topic! FX vs DX and Wide Angle [View all] , Valentino Awarded for high level skills in landscape and wildlife photography , Wed 02-Jul-08 11:28 AM
Subject
ID
Reply message RE: FX vs DX and Wide Angle
1
Reply message RE: FX vs DX and Wide Angle
2
     Reply message RE: FX vs DX and Wide Angle
3
          Reply message RE: FX vs DX and Wide Angle
4
          Reply message RE: FX vs DX and Wide Angle
6
          Reply message RE: FX vs DX and Wide Angle
7
Reply message RE: FX vs DX and Wide Angle
5
Reply message RE: FX vs DX and Wide Angle
8
Reply message RE: FX vs DX and Wide Angle
9
Reply message RE: FX vs DX and Wide Angle
10
Reply message RE: FX vs DX and Wide Angle
11
Reply message RE: FX vs DX and Wide Angle
12
     Reply message RE: FX vs DX and Wide Angle
13
Reply message As wide as it gets on DX
14
Reply message RE: As wide as it gets on DX
15
Reply message RE: FX vs DX and Wide Angle
16
Reply message RE: FX vs DX and Wide Angle
17
     Reply message RE: FX vs DX and Wide Angle
18
          Reply message RE: FX vs DX and Wide Angle
19
               Reply message RE: FX vs DX and Wide Angle
20
               Reply message RE: FX vs DX and Wide Angle
21
               Reply message RE: FX vs DX and Wide Angle
23
Reply message RE: FX vs DX and Wide Angle
22
Reply message RE: FX vs DX and Wide Angle
24
Reply message RE: FX vs DX and Wide Angle
25
Reply message RE: FX vs DX and Wide Angle
26