Sat 05-Mar-11 02:34 PM | edited Sat 05-Mar-11 02:44 PM by Shy Talk
Hello again Brian.
No way! I was just having a very gentle probe at this FX/DX thing.
Let's get one thing clear. Whatever the question is, I'm not the one to answer it.
As you know, I just allied my 300 with a new 700. I've not picked the 300 up since, but I will be using it a lot this year for telephoto stuff. The real wonder tho, is the 700. Now, it might not be the FX effect, it might be the 700 itself, but there is something about the 700 pix that is so relaxed and natural looking.
I'm not clever enough to even put into words what I'm thinking, so best just to pipe down really.
There's more to FX than the spec sheet states, I think.
I'm looking forward to 2011s' photo opportunities more than ever. I'll use both DX and FX this year but really, the 700 must be the best bang-for-buck camera body ever.
And, in my case, almost a freebie-paid for by flogging yards of OM stuff. I'm like a dog with two tails!
Edit to add: Musical. I bought the old. OLD, 24-120 D 'Streetsweeper' to try out. It's not been off! I've got the 16-35VR- it's not been on!
Wingman: I agree, perhaps you are more eloquent than me. Fancy trying to put it into words?