Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.

English German French

Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries Recent Photos Contest Help Search News Workshops Shop Upgrade Membership Recommended
members
All members Wiki Contests Vouchers Apps Newsletter THE NIKONIAN™ Magazines Podcasts Fundraising

D700 is NOT a Full Frame D300

Joe Mondello

US
168 posts

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author

"D700 is NOT a Full Frame D300"

Joe Mondello Registered since 11th Apr 2007
Thu 14-Aug-08 01:37 PM

As D3 owner (8 months) who is very interested in the D700, I keep reading this notion that the D700 is an overpriced D300FX because the only difference between them is the sensor.

Having attended a couple of day-long Nikon events recently and handled the camera and seen what is under the skin, I have to disagree and say that the D700 is a more compact D3.

Holding the D300 and the D700 side by side should immediately put to rest this idea, but I don't think very many have had that opportunity.

The difference in "feel" between a D300 and a D3 is obvious to anyone who's picked both up. The D700 is in the D3 class -- not the D300 class -- of build and weathersealing. The D300 has a lot more plastic, the D700 is virtually all magnesium like the D3.

So in terms of pricing, the D700 is not "an overpriced D300FX" it is a "bargain D3 compact."

Of course, JMO!

A general, generic topic D700 is NOT a Full Frame D300 [View all] , Joe Mondello , Thu 14-Aug-08 11:37 AM
Subject
ID
Reply message RE: D700 is NOT a Full Frame D300
1
Reply message RE: D700 is NOT a Full Frame D300
2
Reply message RE: D700 is NOT a Full Frame D300
3
Reply message RE: D700 is NOT a Full Frame D300
4