>Couple of things to think about. > >You can get two D300's, or a D300 and a Nikon FX 24-70 f2.8 >(superb glass) to go with it for the price of a D700 and >change. > >The D700 is virtually the same camera electronically as the >D300 with the exception of the sensor. That's how good the >D300 electronics are. See the reviews. > >And, the D300 takes excellent images, even at 3200 ISO. > >I'm not trying to talk you out of buying an FX D700...if you >need it...or just really want it...but that is a lot of extra >money if you aren't shooting really wide and in reduced light >a lot of the time. > >So, if you have to choose between the low light capabilities >of the D700 and the reach of the D300...one of them is going >to cost you a lot more. > >Just my two cents... > >Ed > > > > > > > >
I have a 28-70 which is really not a 28-70 on a DX body,thats why i want the D700. And the 28-70 cost more than the D300,so i find the D700 worth the price.