>Heck, why not advocate a 10-12 MP sensor from a >point-and-shoot? Those are even more dense, no? Those sensors >are far tinier, deliver more noise, poorer quality, and have >even more limited high ISO choices, correct?
Ok, so to have more details it is not just in more mpix thing. Things are connected to each other. More mpix mean more noise at high iso which destroy details , etc..
What about low iso then? Low iso = less noise = more details?