Tue 01-Jul-08 08:37 AM | edited Tue 01-Jul-08 11:19 AM by RoFus
>Am I the only one who is wondering what all the fuss is about >concerning the D700? Unless someone is into very wide angle >photography, below 20 mm focal length, or mainly shoots under >very low light conditions, what is the advantage over a D300?
if you own a collection of old (non-DX) glass, you have 2 options:
1) replace old glass with equivalent DX 2) buy FX body
Option 1 will cost you more then the equivalent of a D3 in new glass Option 2 in form of a D3 is not a low cost option either. Plus the D3 might be overkill for many people.
In my specific situation, a D700 for 2,599€ is exactly what I missed from Nikon the past years. Somebody else might come to another valid conclusion.