Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.

English German French

Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries Recent Photos Contest Help Search News Workshops Shop Upgrade Membership Recommended
members
All members Wiki Contests Vouchers Apps Newsletter THE NIKONIAN™ Magazines Podcasts Fundraising
johno

St. Louis, US
525 posts

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author

"RE: D700 Joy"

johno Silver Member Nikonian since 23rd May 2006
Mon 28-Jul-08 10:54 PM

I used the 28-105 for macro on the D200 and not much at all with the D300. I had the 18-200 by the time the D300 arrived, and find that range to be better for walking around. I was very pleasantly surprised with the image quality from that 28-105 lens when I looked at the photos on my computer monitor last night.

It seems that the 28-105 is enjoying a rebirth from several posts I have seen here and at another forum. I recommend anybody who isn't too hung up being seen with a $3000 camera with a $150 lens snag a 28-105 while the getting is still good. (I suspect any nikonphiles who have spent $1700 or whatever for a 24-70 would be slow to give the 28-105 its due, but seeing how that lens functions on the D700 I would not spend my money for the 24-70 given I have that range covered well enough.)

That said, I am faced with re-thinking my humble lenses now that I have a camera that I can live happily with no matter what gets released by Nikon next month. or next year. I can't seem Nikon having another camera body customer in me for a long while now. (NAS denial, I know.)

I'm loving how the 20 2.8 and the 50 1.8 work on the camera, and have not yet tried the Tokina 100-300 F4 on it. But I want to have a few more lenses that are "higher" wuality. (Although that Tokina is very nice except for its artillery weight and size.)

Regardless, having film-like lens behavior in a DSLR with low light capabilities that this D700 produces is a case of love at first sight.

I left 35 MM film behind for a 6-year divorce-limited detour through P&S canon powershot (the EX TOOK my film camera with her), my first exposure to digital, and when I moved to DX it never felt "right."

The D700 feels right. The D300 was a giant leap forward in attainable good-image quality, and the D700 puts me right back where I am comfortable again in terms of camera behavior.

I have seen respected reviewers say low light performance is a "faux" reason for getting the D700. I will be curious to see how this reviewer revisits that claim.

Now to find a larger hard drive and get set up for RAID....I'm going to need it.

A general, generic topic D700 Joy [View all] , johno Silver Member , Mon 28-Jul-08 01:48 PM
Subject
ID
Reply message RE: D700 Joy
1
Reply message RE: D700 Joy
2
Reply message RE: D700 Joy
3
     Reply message RE: D700 Joy
4
          Reply message RE: D700 Joy
5