Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.

English German French

Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries Recent Photos Contest Help Search News Workshops Shop Upgrade Membership Recommended
members
All members Wiki Contests Vouchers Apps Newsletter THE NIKONIAN™ Magazines Podcasts Fundraising

Dye Sub vs.Ink jet

adamojr

Munhall, US
212 posts

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author

"Dye Sub vs.Ink jet"

adamojr Registered since 01st Nov 2002
Wed 06-Nov-02 08:04 PM

Hi folks,

I have a question about photo printers I'm hoping you can help me with. I'm making the switch to digital and I'll need a good printer. I've looked at the hp's and epsons and they both look good but they are ink jet. I'm also looking at a kodak 8500 dye sub. As you can imagine, different salesmen are giving me different stories. Do the dye subs have greater archival longevity? Do the ink jets fade after a year? I don't want customers coming back complaining about faded photos. I just want the best printer for my money. If dye sub is better I don't mind paying more for it. If it's equal quality why spend the money? Can anyone give me the pros and cons?
Thanks.

Adam

Adam

"If your pictures aren't good enough, you aren't close enough." Robert Capa
www.primetimeshots.com
www.sportsshooter.com/adamojr

A general, generic topic Dye Sub vs.Ink jet [View all] , adamojr , Wed 06-Nov-02 07:04 PM
Subject
ID
Reply message RE: Dye Sub vs.Ink jet
1
Reply message RE: Dye Sub vs.Ink jet
2
Reply message RE: Dye Sub vs.Ink jet
3
     Reply message RE: Dye Sub vs.Ink jet
4
          Reply message RE: Dye Sub vs.Ink jet
5
Reply message RE: Dye Sub vs.Ink jet
6
Reply message RE: Dye Sub vs.Ink jet
8
Reply message RE: Dye Sub vs.Ink jet
7
Reply message RE: Dye Sub vs.Ink jet
9