Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.

English German French

Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries Recent Photos Contest Help Search News Workshops Shop Upgrade Membership Recommended
members
All members Wiki Contests Vouchers Apps Newsletter THE NIKONIAN™ Magazines Podcasts Fundraising

Digital Imagin - a phylosofical question.

Mikepoison

Amsterdam, NL
255 posts

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author

"RE: Digital Imagin - a phylosofical question."

Mikepoison Basic Member
Tue 27-Jun-00 08:51 AM

I would prefer to call it an honest voicing of opinion

There will be no barrage, you're right. I had the same thought when I woke up, wondering how the people who painted protraits for a living had reacted to the coming of the BnW photographs. I'm guessing they looked down at it, as it had no color, and therefor could never be a proper view of the person. of course, I'm just guessing. and now, with digital photography, as we keep getting more and more mexapixels, on smaller and smaller areas, the only limitation becomes the optics once again. digital imagery is more elaborate than photography, with more easily acceptable possibilities of manipulation and beautification. unlike photographs, it doesn't end with taking a roll to be developped, but it allows you complete freedom.

I agree that it's easier for a photographer to be a digital imager than the other way around, but only for the time being, as the resolutions and ISO sensitivity are insanely priced, and the true part of the camera, the optics, are second in limiting factor of the images. One day .. D1s for the masses.

Perhaps it is even necesary to redefine "digital imaging" in this opinion to "digital photography", because there are beautyfull realistic looking scenes that involved no photography at all generated on computers.

Perhaps digital imaging is the merger between painting and photography, as we try to go back to that personal level of changing and working with a base image, and see where it will end. Of course, there is a certain advantage to having an undo function. because there is an acceptable large large margin of error, as all can be undone, it will be looked upon as less than an artform from both photography and painting, but it's still art. (As any CG artist will tell you =)

Mike

A general, generic topic Digital Imagin - a phylosofical question. [View all] , Mikepoison , Tue 20-Jun-00 04:03 AM
Subject
ID
Reply message RE: Digital Imagin - a phylosofical question.
1
Reply message RE: Digital Imagin - a phylosofical question.
2
Reply message RE: Digital Imagin - a phylosofical question.
3
Reply message The art of photography vs. and the art of CG
4
     Reply message RE: The art of photography vs. and the art of CG
5
          Reply message RE: The art of photography vs. and the art of CG
6
               Reply message RE: The art of photography vs. and the art of CG
7
Reply message RE: Digital Imagin - a phylosofical question.
8
Reply message RE: Digital Imagin - a phylosofical question.
9
     Reply message RE: Digital Imagin - a phylosofical question.
10