>Hi Phillip, > >The Q3 will perform well with your lenses but the Q10 will do >even better. For an extra $50 or so you get the peace of mind >that you got a little better performance and future proofing. > >A nose heavy lens like a 105 micro or a 24-70/2.8 is actually >much more difficult than the well balanced 70-200. Similarly >with a 17-55/2.8 DX. > >The Q3 was primarily designed for use on a monopod or small >traveler type tripod where weight and bulk is a very high >priority.
Actually, that brings up an important detail that I left out. I may periodically use it on a tripod, but I will primarily use it on a monopod. Does that change your opinion?