Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.

English German French

Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries Recent Photos Contest Help Search News Workshops Shop Upgrade Membership Recommended
members
All members Wiki Contests Vouchers Apps Newsletter THE NIKONIAN™ Magazines Podcasts Fundraising
philipbaker

Stockport, UK
53 posts

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author

"RE: D50 Sharpness"

philipbaker Registered since 17th Sep 2010
Fri 08-Oct-10 04:23 AM

Hello Brian

As I value your opinion very highly I have taken the liberty of posting 5 images on My Gallery for your perusal.

I am sorry to impose on your good nature but I do need help as you will see.

This is very much back to basics but I have to start somewhere so I have selected 5 images with my shortest lens and without any post processing. I felt I would not move further forward until I got the basics right.

Sorry to say, the images are a reflection of this area of the UK. As you may know 2010 years ago while America had the bison roving free England was conquered by the Romans, returned to the Anglo-Saxons, conquered by the Normans,developed by the Industrial Revolution and became a Kingdom in the process, none of which gave us a Yosemite landscape.

Kindest regards

Philip

This is a hot, active topic! D50 Sharpness [View all] , philipbaker , Thu 30-Sep-10 07:48 AM
Subject
ID
Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
1
Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
2
Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
3
Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
8
Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
9
Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
11
Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
4
Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
10
Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
12
Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
7
Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
13
Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
14
Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
15
     Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
16
     Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
17
          Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
18
               Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
19
                    Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
20
                         Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
21
                              Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
22
                                   Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
23
                                   Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
24
                                        Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
25
                                             Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
26
                                             Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
27
                                             Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
28
                                             Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
29
                                             Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
30
                                             Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
31
                                             Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
32
                                             Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
33
                                             Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
34
                                             Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
35
                                             Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
36
                                             Reply message RE: D50 Sharpness
37
                                             Reply message RE:Critique
38
                                             Reply message RE:Critique
39
                                             Reply message RE:Critique
40
                                             Reply message RE:Critique
41
                                             Reply message RE:Critique
48
                                             Reply message RE:Critique
42
                                             Reply message RE:Critique
43
                                             Reply message RE:Critique
44
                                             Reply message RE: Critique
45
                                                  Reply message RE: Critique
46
                                                  Reply message RE: Critique
47