Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.

English German French

Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries Recent Photos Contest Help Search News Workshops Shop Upgrade Membership Recommended
members
All members Wiki Contests Vouchers Apps Newsletter THE NIKONIAN™ Magazines Podcasts Fundraising

D1x or D100 files vs. scans from LS2000 &/or 4000

photons

Avon, US
504 posts

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author

"RE: D1x or D100 files vs. scans from LS2000 &/or 4000"

photons Gold Member Nikonian since 01st Jul 2002
Tue 10-Sep-02 11:23 PM

I have made what I consider very high quality 12 x 18-inch prints from scanned (LS4000) negatives and slides as well as from D100 files. Since receiving the D100, I have not scanned one film original.

The direct digital is infectious.

Russ in CT

Visit my Nikonians gallery.

A general, generic topic D1x or D100 files vs. scans from LS2000 &/or 4000 [View all] , dougie , Wed 16-Jan-08 12:07 PM
Subject
ID
Reply message RE: D1x or D100 files vs. scans from LS2000 &/or 4000
1
Reply message RE: D1x or D100 files vs. scans from LS2000 &/or 4000
2
Reply message RE: D1x or D100 files vs. scans from LS2000 &/or 4000
3
     Reply message RE: D1x or D100 files vs. scans from LS2000 &/or 4000
4
          Reply message RE: D1x or D100 files vs. scans from LS2000 &/or 4000
5