Even though we ARE Nikon lovers,we are NOT affiliated with Nikon Corp. in any way.

English German French

Sign up Login
Home Forums Articles Galleries Recent Photos Contest Help Search News Workshops Shop Upgrade Membership Recommended
members
All members Wiki Contests Vouchers Apps Newsletter THE NIKONIAN™ Magazines Podcasts Fundraising

D1x or D100 files vs. scans from LS2000 &/or 4000

SheldonYoung

CA
117 posts

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author

"RE: D1x or D100 files vs. scans from LS2000 &/or 4000"

SheldonYoung Basic Member
Tue 10-Sep-02 08:31 PM

Quality wise they're all very good. Going from scanning slides to shooting direct digital was a huge convenience and time saver, not just in scanning but in having to clean the image after it was scanned.

Sheldon Young

A general, generic topic D1x or D100 files vs. scans from LS2000 &/or 4000 [View all] , dougie , Wed 16-Jan-08 12:07 PM
Subject
ID
Reply message RE: D1x or D100 files vs. scans from LS2000 &/or 4000
1
Reply message RE: D1x or D100 files vs. scans from LS2000 &/or 4000
2
Reply message RE: D1x or D100 files vs. scans from LS2000 &/or 4000
3
     Reply message RE: D1x or D100 files vs. scans from LS2000 &/or 4000
4
          Reply message RE: D1x or D100 files vs. scans from LS2000 &/or 4000
5